Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure would only create more environmental damage. Instead the best course of action is to murder the executives and politicians that allow/subsidize them
@Whey_Isolate@bezmuth That's right. Even without subsidize, we would use fossil fuel. Not most people and their car. But one tractor can do the job of like 500 people in a field. Then we get a few tons of cereal.
Genuinely came to that conclusion a while back as well. That and the fact that going heavily into politics is probably for most people the best chance to enact the most change. Which is a weird thought.
9 replies
Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure would only create more environmental damage. Instead the best course of action is to murder the executives and politicians that allow/subsidize them
this comment went from sensible to taliban real quick.
@Whey_Isolate @bezmuth That's right. Even without subsidize, we would use fossil fuel. Not most people and their car. But one tractor can do the job of like 500 people in a field. Then we get a few tons of cereal.
Genuinely came to that conclusion a while back as well. That and the fact that going heavily into politics is probably for most people the best chance to enact the most change. Which is a weird thought.
Literally me
Half of its made easier for you by its use of flammable material :3
And the atmosphere is full of oxygen, we're already 2/3 the way there
I can't help but think that those who block private jets shut go further and destroy a few of them.
Based and FF7-pilled