Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on kbin.social

3 replies

kbin.social

I mean true enough, but that's not what's going on here. Copyright exists so artists can profit from their work, so if there's no artist it stands to reason copyright law shouldn't apply.

9
lemmy.ca

They will just use it to generate scripts, change it enough with a human and claim it's just a tool.

Don't think for one second this will slow down greed.

5

Those scripts are going to make the current scripts look like classic literature.

3

You reached the end

AI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pause | Spyke