Interesting arguments but it absolutely reads like fanboyism. The "features missing from Wayland" in particular reads like someone who didn't care to give Wayland a fair shot
Right? All of the "if only you gave X11 a chance to develop this it would've been fine" at the same time as showing how diametrically opposed the maintenance team's philosophy is... Not a compelling argument
7 replies
Shut up. This whole x11 vs Wayland argument is so stupid
Interesting arguments but it absolutely reads like fanboyism. The "features missing from Wayland" in particular reads like someone who didn't care to give Wayland a fair shot
Yeah, not to speak of stuff that doesn’t work/work well in X, and it’s bizarre quirks.
90% of the content depends upon an unspoken lie-by-ommision to present its case, or is just a flat out lie.
This whole post should probably just be reported and removed
I think what little progress has been made is specifically because distros have started defaulting to Wayland
Right? All of the "if only you gave X11 a chance to develop this it would've been fine" at the same time as showing how diametrically opposed the maintenance team's philosophy is... Not a compelling argument
Please don't spam this post.