Spyke

Also a convicted felon, and an insurrectionist unconstitutionally occupying the White House.

I'm sure his barely-passing BA in business from Penn would qualify him to second-guess Krugman, if Trump weren't also dumb as a bag of hammers.

5
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Call it what it is, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.

Alfred Nobel made awards for 5 fields. Economics is not one of them. Economists invented their own prize with Nobel's name somewhere in the title to try and trick people into thinking its a real science. The headline is wrong and should be corrected to read:

Trump Goes Nuclear on Riksbank Prize-Winning Economist Paul Krugman Over Tariffs Jab: ‘Deranged BUM’

43
lemmy.zip

Economics is absolutely a real science. That's like saying sociology isn't a real science.

0

Karl Popper came up with his criteria for what constitutes science specifically to discredit "soft" sciences, largely because, as an extreme conservative, he didn't like their conclusions. Like psychology, early work in economics was not experimental in nature, and also like psychology, there are some tricky ethical issues with conducting many experiments. However, economic modeling has reasonably good (and proven) predictive power in many cases, so it's not just handwavey bullshit. And I'm not an economist trying to defend my turf, I'm a computer guy with a mathematical modeling and physics background, both in my education and in work experience.

And just to put things in perspective: astrophysics also has many important but non-replicable results. So does paleontology. As does biology. It's tricky to cause a new Big Bang, build a black hole, or restart evolution. So be dismissive if you like, but replicability is difficult in any social science, and that doesn't mean that those sciences are a waste of time.

1

It’s political economy with the politics “removed.” As if you can just subtract the human, political impact of political economy and meaningfully “only” talk cold hard dollars.

4
lemmy.world

Just because Trump doesn't like the former chief economic advisor to Reagan, doesn't mean he's suddenly a great guy...

Sometimes (a lot of times) it's just two assholes fighting and neither are a good person.

24

Yeah, Krugman isn't exactly a progressive radical, but of all the well known mainstream economists he is by far the most sane.

14

But we overused the fuck out of slammed already. If they over use this, they may have to resort to the dreaded "goes QUANTUM" before circling back to "blasts"

4

“BEST MARKET IN HISTOY”

DOW on 1/21 - 44,025.81. Market closed 1/20 for MLK Day.

Currently - 43,992.42.

-601.23 (-1.35%)past 6 months
-379.09 (-0.85%)past month
-207.65 (-0.47%)past 5 days
-183.19 (-0.41%)today

13
lemmy.world

Roflmao, what was Krugman's Nobel prize for? Oh yeah, international trade. I think he knows a bit about tariffs.

12

Sometimes the children actually have the correct comeback: I know what you are, but what am I?

10

Trump has been working hard to get his Nobel prize for peace. It would be funny if the war criminal get it before him.

7
lemmy.world

Trump wants to sue his former employer for something he did after leaving said employer?

That math ain't mathing

4

You reached the end