Spyke

Yes I'm still surprised the government haven't released the documents they are holding for the child rape ring that includes powerful politicians such as Trump.

3

Yet MAGA women will still praise his name and twice on Sundays. Fuck this timeline and everyone who made it happen.

68

Schulz, who went through the IVF process with his wife, seemed genuinely flabbergasted the notoriously dishonest president had lied about this. Sadly, however, Schulz doesn’t seem to have drawn the correct conclusion, which is that he should shut up about politics forever.

Look - if you still believe what this guy tells you after almost 10 years of nothing but lies, I got nothin’.

67

But but but this is the first lie I paid attention to because it affected me directly! How could he do this to me specifically? It’s only every single other person that he was supposed to lie to, and about!

Them, probably

25

I'm sure you can find something. Like a ha-ha Nelson jpg, or a Pic of a fat leopard or something.

5
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Instead of treatment, Project 2025 proposes shaming patients for premarital sex

This shit makes no fucking sense. What, do married people not need IVF?

Am I wrong in thinking that the majority of women seeking treatment for infertility are married?

57
discuss.tchncs.de

What they are saying is that women who are unable to conceive while married are being punished for having had premarital sex and for having used birth control.

50
lemmy.world

No that's actually how they think. They're insane. Like actually insane. Howling at the moon, rubber room and grippy sock, danger to themselves and others bat shit insane. Gleefully bounding into new unknown lands of just snake-fuckingly crazy.

I was raised in it. They really believe that all suffering is a curse from their impotent god. And that everyone who is suffering deserves it for one vague "sin" or another.

43

They really believe that all suffering is a curse from their impotent god. And that everyone who is suffering deserves it for one vague "sin" or another.

Which is hilarious because according to their holy text that’s not how this works.

There are examples in the Old Testament of God being like, “I’m going to punish you because of such-and-such,” but that doesn’t mean every bad thing is a punishment.

Jesus disciples were like, “Why was this man born blind? Was it his sin or his parents’ sin?” And Jesus said, “Neither, duh.”

It’s depressing to me how focused on sin evangelicals are. The whole point of Christianity is that all have sinned and fallen short, so they need Jesus. But evangelicals don’t know shit about their own theology. They sing their songs about how great and powerful their god is and they go out to judge people and enforce their idea of the law.

21
lemmy.world

Blaming birth control for later infertility has a long history despite being absolutely unproven medically.

20
Revan343reply
lemmy.ca

You mean Donald Trump, pedophile and proven rapist?

8
D_Creply
sh.itjust.works

Is that the same guy that rapes children and is on the Epstein list?

5
Tjareply
programming.dev

No, that can't be. Once they release the epstein files I'm sure he'll be totally exonerated.

4

It'll be the biggest exoneration, like no exoneration that has ever been seen before. I was on the phone to Chy-naaa and they came to me and said "Mr President, how do you put on such a good exoneration?"

7
lemmy.ca

In reality, as I’ve written before, they resent IVF for the same reasons they loathe abortion and birth control — conservatives believe women should be enslaved to their biology.

They believe women should be enslaved in every way.

56

A lot of Theo-Bros that want women to be chained to their husbands by outlawing no-cause divorce. Then they will redefine narrow rules for which causes are justifiable causes. They're already trying to legalize child marriage. They've already made single living a poverty lifestyle for most. So they are happily coercing women into marriages and locking them in there because they know sane woman would not willingly partner with them for their whole lives, and getting rid of their choice is easier (for them) than being a person they would choose.

25
lemmy.world

This is hilarious. I know a couple who voted for him specifically for his free IVF campaign promise.

46

I guess they learned nothing from his first term and the vapid and meaningless slogan of "promises made, promises kept".

Even towards the end of his first term, I saw his base mindlessly repeating that and clapping like trained seals at some qon events. You have to be a special kind of stupid, I guess...

11

Let's start attacking women's rights and making financial stability a dream out of reach for most working Americans, that'll make women want to have children!

Wait, they're not? We'll obviously it's the women's fault!

30

Yes, very on-brand.

I had to laugh when these dipsticks took up the mantra of "promises made, promises kept" in his first term.

WTF, these asshats got nothing from Taco unless they were multi-millionaires. He promised many things in his first term and many of these fucking morons voted for him again after he gave them nothing but the spectacle of "owning the libs".

25

In which case we know how that ends. And a nice roadmap for starting the fight to take it all back. So in advance, thanks Qatar.

3
lemmy.today

MAGA women not being able to have children is a win

16
npdeanreply
lemmy.today

This will trigger a lot of people but since Trump has been elected, it is safe to assume that more than 50% women support him, so....

-11
lemmy.world

Mmmm im pretty sure he only got like 1/3 of women, it was men who carried him

Edit: closer to half but women still went majority for Harris

13

So... The first picture isn't really relevant since it doesn't appear to factor in race.

The second one is nearly meaningless to me as a static photo. What the hell am I even looking at? Clearly this is something meant to be interacted with.

3
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

gonna need to see some stats. republiQan women had their chance and it's gone now.

-1

Lol - gonna need to see stats (downvotes a-poppin')

Edit: okay not 2/3 more like half (downvotes continue)

😆

0
npdeanreply
lemmy.today

It is quite a logical assumption, excluding gerrymandering

-4

If a candidate wins a majority of the population as a whole, it is not logical to assume they won a majority of all demographics in that population.

More specifically, in the previous 2 times he ran before the 2024 election, we knew that the majority of women voters voted against him. And that he won one of those elections in spite of not getting a majority of women. So the logical thing to assume would be that he didn't get the majority of women in 2024 either, in spite of the fact that he won that election. Which is what happened.

4

Well, almost half of women that voted supported him! Guess we'll just have to abandon the whole lot. Problem solved.

1

We are neck-deep in a lot of insanely stupid people in this country. Lots of people think he's a bigly important successful bidness man, too, despite all the evidence to the contrary.

5
lemmy.world

This country needs to ensure the future of its conservative values. I suggest taking everyone in the Heritage foundation and putting them in a strategic federal conservative reserve (i.e. Locking them in an abandoned salt mine for decades.)

8

Just put them in the same storage site as the spent nuclear material. That way we already have the easy, one-way access to the storage area.

1

We're really going back to behaving like we're living in the middle ages. Your wife can't conceive? Time to find an excuse to get rid of her as that's one of her only purposes and you need a heir.

7

Holy fuck I'm so glad I just got a hysterectomy. I was terrified BC was gonna be targeted and it was the only thing keeping my endometriosis and debilitating periods at bay. Symptoms of recurring endometriosis started happening last year and in February my specialist approved a hysterectomy. I got the procedure done 3 weeks ago. Seems like I got it done just in time, too.

5
piefed.zip

I have a question. Is it true that sperm get killed in the vagina by the vagina protection software while trying to win the race . If that is true then does not ivf makes like being able to buy battlepass with money and leave everyone behind and will it increase the chance of disability in the baby's

0
  1. What happens in natural conception

Yes, the vagina, cervix, and uterus have a lot of built-in defenses. These exist to protect against infections — but sperm have to pass through the same gauntlet.

Vaginal acidity → The vagina is acidic (pH ~3.8–4.5) to kill bacteria and fungi. This acidity does kill many sperm almost instantly.

Cervical mucus → Acts like a filter. During most of the cycle, it’s thick and blocks sperm. Around ovulation, it becomes thinner and more “friendly,” but still selective.

Immune system → White blood cells can attack sperm as “foreign” cells.

Structural obstacles → Only a small fraction of sperm (~1 in a million) make it to the fallopian tubes.

So yes — you can think of it as most sperm being “eliminated” before reaching the egg. The survivors are the fastest, most motile, and most resilient. 2. IVF and your “battle pass” analogy

In In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), sperm don’t have to run the full gauntlet — they’re either placed near the egg in a lab dish (classic IVF) or directly injected into the egg (ICSI). So in gamer terms:

Natural conception → 1 million players drop in, only one survives to win.

IVF → The system says, “You’ve already bought VIP access, here’s the final round.”

3. Does bypassing natural selection increase disability risk?

This is where nuance matters:

In natural conception, the weakest sperm usually never reach the egg, so there’s a degree of “natural selection” at the sperm level.

In IVF, especially with ICSI (where one sperm is injected directly), some of that natural selection is bypassed.

Studies show:

Slightly higher risks of some rare genetic or imprinting disorders in IVF/ICSI babies (e.g., Beckwith–Wiedemann, Angelman syndrome).

Slightly higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight.

However, most IVF babies are healthy, and the increased risk is small in absolute terms.

Many scientists think that these risks come more from underlying infertility issues in the parents rather than IVF itself. In other words, if someone’s sperm or eggs already have higher risk factors, IVF isn’t creating them — it’s just making fertilization possible despite them.

✅ In short:

Yes, the vagina does “kill” most sperm — that’s natural selection.

IVF does skip a lot of that process — kind of like paying for early access in a game.

There is a small increase in certain risks, but the vast majority of IVF babies are healthy
1