Spyke

There's a lot wrong with that gun.. like how the cylinder appears to revolve around the barrel. And how there are five chambers and none of them are at the top.

6
BigDictionreply
lemmy.world

I SEE A FEW GUNZ PICS BUT CANT HEAR A LICK OF WHAT THEY SAYIN!!

2
lemmy.today

Yeah, at first glance, that gun is a soup sandwich. However:

the cylinder appears to revolve around the barrel.

Seems to have taken some inspiration from the Lemat revolver.

AFAIK, the Lemat was a cap-fired muzzleloader, but there is a fairly realistic rendition of what it could look like as a breechloader:

and none of them are at the top.

That's not necessarily a problem either:

(Chiappa Rhino)

If the hole in the bottom is a small-bore revolver barrel, firing from the 6 o'clock position, and the gun features a second, single-shot, large-bore barrel above it, it could work.

8
SkyezOpenreply
lemmy.world

Nifty examples of unusual revolvers, but in the image the cylinders would never actually line up with the barrel at all.

That said I'D CRANK MY HOG HOLDING THAT GUN BROTHER

8

Nifty examples of unusual revolvers, but in the image the cylinders would never actually line up with the barrel at all

Consider this:

On most revolvers, this circled feature would be the hinge pin for the cylinder crane, allowing it to swing out for reloading. But, this thing is clearly not "most" revolvers. That's not a pin.

That circled feature is in line with the bottom chamber of the revolver. Nothing else is lined up with any chamber. That circled feature has to be the barrel for the revolver cylinder.

The big barrel above it is a secondary, single-shot shotgun barrel. This barrel is much larger than the chambers in the revolver cylinder; it can't be driving the small projectile fired from those chambers.

The only way this gun works is if it is a two-barreled gun like the Lemat. The revolver fires from the bottom barrel rather than the top, like the Rhino.

2

You reached the end

FIBER?! YOU CALLING ME A LIAR? | Spyke