Spyke
lemmy.world

I must be really old because the only words I understood from that sentence was slurs and fucking stupid.

6
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net

The word slurs is false

The user clearly didn’t meant to insult or slur at people having schizophrenia

-2

So if I were to call someone a "fag" that's not a slur against gay people? In exactly the same way "Schizo" is a slur against folks with schizophrenia. It's not rocket science. You are using their disorder as an example of something that's wrong/bad. How do you think that makes folks with schizophrenia feel? You freeze peach idiots are only interested in yourselves.

3

2 upvotes on a 1h old comment from an old thread? You brought your alt accounts to boost your upvotes?

1
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net

Schizo is short for schizophrenia

Fag is short for removed, which is already homophobic

You're really going to compare this to "removed" and, to an extent, "removed"? These words are obviously meant to discriminate those people, when I've never seen "schizo" be used to discriminate people having this mental disorder

You are using their disorder as an example of something that's wrong/bad

Well it is bad... I believe nobody wants to have schizophrenia, just like dementia and Alzheimer's, yet I believe you're fine with people saying those words when you have bad memory, unless you believe that's a slur as well? I don't believe it was ever meant to discriminate those people, or to say that they are inferior in any way.

You freeze peach idiots are only interested in yourselves.

Bold assumption to make, when you're making a tantrum about a specific subject. No, we're not. And if I'm wrong, then I'll admit it. Banning straight up for 7 days (iirc) is not the way to go to educate people. You assume bad intentions which can only end up wrong.

I do agree that using the word like that is inaccurate and might be a bit offensive, but claiming someone is ableist because of this is far fetched

-1

By the way, banning me from your community will not make you be right magically

That's really childish

1
rnerclereply
sh.itjust.works

![email protected] is a heaven for trolls who have nothing to contribute but their opinions. There's nothing to learn there :/

i couldn't see what you're referring to, though

-1
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net

What are you talking about? I never said anything about this community

2

I’m used to posting links from the author's instance, I don’t think it should change anything

1

Horse shit, there's a few regular commentors that do their best with every question they can, and even more that contribute irregularly but in good faith, even if they fall short of accuracy.

1
jjmoldyreply
lemmy.world

the only way to get into whatever version of heaven you believe in is to kill as many nazis and zionists as you can. fuck ICE, fuck trump, and fuck the liberals that put him into power. proud member of the db0 grassroots left wing qanon Russian troll farm sent to divide you all.

Guy acts tough and badass, is actually a lifeless moron with skin thinner than paper. Tale as old as the web.

5
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net

Yea, like… me for saying the ban was stupid?

This is getting ridiculous now

Good thing I made the community heh

-1
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net

It’s funny that the person, who is really upset about a poorly chosen word and someone getting offended by it, defends Luigi Mangione, a killer

You really see the contrast. Cherry pick your defending cause and axis. A bit incoherent

-3

Yea you're right, defending someone who murdered a rich guy. How brave

you're the piece of shit if you believe everyone should support his action

-1
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net

In part as well. There are many things that have built up over time, this whole post made me realize I had enough

4
ipitcoreply
lemmybefree.net
  • Not wanting people to downvote what they don't agree with
  • Easily consider things as brigading and vote manipulation
  • Easy censorship on specific subjects (including anti AI even though anti AI people are annoying from time to time)
  • Fear of not being able to criticize db0's administration
1
[deleted]reply
lemmy.world

Also one of the YPTB mods is in a group with like 3 others who all:

Flood user modlogs with unfounded accusations of vote manipulation and trolling.

Think that people browsing All should know the size and history of every community before downvoting a single post. Also don't understand what lurkers are and assume intent.

Take downvoting very personally.

3
[deleted]reply
lemmy.world

Off the top of my head.

unruffled at dbzero hypes up the conspiracy that everyone who gets banned for vote manipulation/whatever deserves it. I think they posted something about the brigade menace and treat a handful of down votes on something as the end of the world.

cryptagion at dbzero does mass bans for one or a few down votes

mystic mushroom at dbzero does mass bans for one or a few down votes

Also jet at hackertalks does mass bans for one or a few down votes

Think there was one other too but can't remember their name. The complaint is that they don't understand what lurkers are (vote but don't comment) or that people might browse all and not care about AI but down vote something because it is awful. Then they make ridiculous accusations and accuse anyone who disagrees with them of being a troll.

If they just banned down votes and banned anyone who down voted with the reason 'down votes not allowed' then they would not be getting the widespread negative reaction that they are getting by accusing people of brigading or vote manipulation or 'anti-ai harassment' and all their other stupid and insulting made up ban reasons.

4
[deleted]reply
lemmy.world

Yes, unruffed is the one YPTB mod who is cahoots with the other three mods (of other communities) that are all doing the mass bannings, and even using each other's moderation as an excuse for more bans.

Example of mass banning (multiple communities, many users in a short time span)

Note I am perfectly fine with the last one for no down voting allowed for that community. It is stupid and rules don't show in the main feed, but no down voting is in the rules and they were banned without being accused of more than what they did.

-1
BroBot9000reply
lemmy.world

Don’t forget that Jet spreads misinformation about meat based diets and sudo health science in multiple communities that they moderate.

2
[deleted]reply
lemmy.world

Yeah, he was the reason I dug in my heels against the stupid 'if you don't like it then ignore it' bullshit which is fine for music and sports but down voting misinformation is one of the main purposes of the down vote!

2

Exactly!

Some of the shit getting posted deserves to be downvoted. It’s a feature here for visibility purposes. Pretending it doesn’t exist and banning people that use is just so asinine.

Don’t want downvotes? Go to YouTube and get coddled by the corpos.

1
[deleted]reply
lemmy.world

People can't see the community rules when browsing All you fucking donkey.

Also, down voting is NOT against the rules unless they were changed recently recently.

0

Downvoting being forbidden is dumb and unfair

That would be actual vote manipulation by mods

-1

looking through this persons comment history just shows that they're probably just a right-wing troll. And the descriptions in the community of it being a "free-speach" community just confirms that.

3

I’m not and if you associate free speech with hate speech then that’s on you

If you associate discrimination with right then that’s also wrong (and I don’t believe I’ve done such thing anyways)

Idk about the instance, we will see if it’s not just a xenophobic mess, I hope not

You’re on blahaj so I believe you don’t have anything to say about free speech because that thing doesn’t really exist in your instance

0