Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.blahaj.zone
anarchism·AnarchismbyFundMECFS

Beyond Electoral Socialism: Why Winning Elections Alone Can’t Ensure Structural Change

There’s a good reason for this, and it’s not (just) that their beliefs were insincere. The whole point of thinking about structures like capitalism, patriarchy, or white supremacy is recognizing structural power beyond the intentions or beliefs of any individual actor. The problem with capitalism isn’t that particular business owners are greedy, it’s that the system of private ownership requires exploitation and poverty. The problem with patriarchy isn’t that all men happen to be evil and all non-men happen to be saints. The problem is the system that secures wealth, power, and safety for one gender at the expense of others.

We should think about state power in the same systematic way. It’s true—some politicians are especially terrible, just like some bosses are particularly noxious and some men are exceptionally patriarchal. But there are structural reasons for all men to take advantage of the privileges of patriarchy, whether we’re personally bigoted or not. Similarly, there are structural forces pressuring leftists in elected office to abandon their positions, entirely independent of their degree of personal ideological commitment

Beyond Electoral Socialism: Why Winning Elections Alone Can’t Ensure Structural Changehttps://itsgoingdown.org/beyond-electoral-socialism-why-winning-elections-alone-cant-ensure-structural-change/Open linkView original on lemmy.blahaj.zone
32

No replies yet

No comments on the original post yet.
Beyond Electoral Socialism: Why Winning Elections Alone Can’t Ensure Structural Change | Spyke