Spyke
lemmy.world

This is the calmest, most insulting thing you could have possibly said.

43
PixxlManreply
lemmy.world

Yeah. This meme makes no sense..

Let's avoid misinforming people please. The reality is bad enough, no need to start lying and deceiving

10

Yes specially if people don't know what a rootkit is. They'll think "ah, so this is an example of a rootkit, it must be because it is upvoted a lot, nice meme *upvotes"

8
MooseBoysreply
lemmy.world

While WEI definitely doesn’t qualify as a rootkit itself, any useful attester is going to require aspects of one - whether it’s a phone asserting that it hasn’t been rooted, or a PC running with approved SecureBoot and TPM keys.

1
MooseBoysreply
lemmy.world

Sure it is. A rootkit is a mechanism for hooking access to highly privileged execution levels of a device, masking its own presence, and persisting itself against removal. TPM + SecureBoot runs in firmware, more privileged than kernel mode. It analyzes the bootloader and other key boot parameters to verify they have not been tampered with. They can’t be disabled from within the OS. And sometimes they can’t be removed or disabled at all without someone finding a vulnerability, as in the case with phone rooting.

2
lemmy.world

Great, but using the TPM as intended is not a rootkit or anything like a rootkit. It's using a security device as intended.

2

Although often associated with it, a rootkit does not inherently need to be malware. In the case of phones, and likely future PCs, they are used to prevent users and owners from modifying their device.

-1
Spudwartreply
lemmy.world

There’s no way to say this one way or the other until it’s implemented.

However to “verify” a system from a hardware level to any decent level of accuracy would require kernel level access.

Technically you’re correct, until you’re not.

-4

Honestly I want to look at funny memes, not be fed fud about something I'm already aware exists. It's not even funny to look at, it's just getting depressing.

Edit: Apparently these memes were posted by one user, so I just blocked that user.

2

Why? You realize it's an internal community here, right?

The group is divided into people who already have Fox and people who dislike it's features enough to use something Chromium like Brave or Vivaldi.

No one's changing their minds over these memes here, and we're not getting visibility from some huge amount of people on a public forum who don't know why chrome bad so that you can proselytize.

At this point it's just making me wish we had more diversity of fucking content.

2
lemmy.ml

I don't think it'll go that far. What I'm more worried about is that the spec calls for multiple attesters. So Microsoft and others might even make their own under the spec.

21
r00tyreply
kbin.life

Every platform that has a vested interest (e.g. is, or is a large contractor of advertising companies) will likely want in on this.

12

If the choices are in or out, any company beholden to investors or shareholders won't really have a lot of options it seems.

7

They are trying to cut off internet access so only paying customers can stay

5

Color me surprised that it's Google that created and pushed for support of this shit.

3

It doesn't matter if it goes short or far. This shit is DRM, and if any part of it makes it into browsers, it's the end of the web as we know it.

10

You reached the end