Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ml
politics·politics byAsh_Bones

Why we should worry about nuclear weapons again

The prospect of global destruction in the Cold War has faded from people's consciousness, but the prospect of living on a nuclear wasteland remains.

View original on lemmy.ml
58

12 replies

lemmy.wtf

Who cares about maybe nukes when we have guaranteed global warming.

21

It's an ongoing joke in several futuristic fandoms like Star Trek and Futurama

Humanity beats global warming by going through nuclear winter caused by global nuclear war.

9

Or be gen-x and been worrying about them all along since that’s how you grew up.

10

The biggest problem is that Trump wants to

He is an idiot child, and he's itching to press every button

He also sees sending a nuke as the most "dominant power" thing he could do

It's a sad indictment on America that this is where things are right now

There are so many people there who deserve better, but it's just a broken country

8
lemm.ee

Ah yes. Better watch ooout. ruskies have nookies. They may useeeee it.

Nuclear waaaaar. Nuuuuuucleaaaaar. WWWWWWAAAAAAAARRRRRRR.

paniced hand waving

Fuck off already.

7

I mean, vis a vis Russia and China, the equation hasn’t really changed.

What has changed:

  • low key pretty certain that orangeboi wants to set one off just because he can, because he has a psychopathic toddler mindset
  • nuclear proliferation is the new black. As a direct result of the non-Russian signatories of the Budapest Memorandum doing effectively fuck-all to concretely back the security, sovereignty, and territorial integrity guarantees laid out in the agreement, it’s very obvious to any geopolitical actor worth their salt that the Memorandum is worth far less than the paper it’s written on. Nukes are the absolute, final word in territorial and sovereignty guarantees. Nobody will invade you if a possible response is “we will start glassing your cities”.
4
sh.itjust.works

Well, yes and no.

We COULD have created a world in which security guarantees backed by major powers and/or alliances could serve as an effective guarantee of territory and sovereignty. All it would have taken is the geopolitical will to actually meaningfully assist Ukraine way back in 2014. But we didn’t, and here we are.

3

It’s all about credibility.

If the promises/threats backing any geopolitical agreement aren’t seen as realistic, actionable, and credible, then the promises/threats are not meaningful.

Side note: what the US is doing right now is setting the credibility we’ve built up over a literal century on fire.

2

You reached the end

Why we should worry about nuclear weapons again | Spyke