Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on vlemmy.net

11 replies

News media and "the truth" is already a dumpster fire. I don't think this is going to be much of a departure.

2

Quoting Carl Sagen: One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.

1

We weren't ready for Photoshop or the internet either.

The younger generations will figure it out as before.

1
vlemmy.net

It's not like AI is really the first time people in the media lie, what's the difference?

0
BrikoXreply
vlemmy.net

The way I see it it's the scale and access. You can spin up an AI bot and make anything trending without a need to pay for a bot farm. And with how most media sucks at verifing sources it will be reported as truth.

0
BrikoXreply
vlemmy.net

Not yet. But it can already connect to the web, so adding ability to create random people looking accounts and mass posting something is not far off.

1
vlemmy.net

But we've already had bots that do that for years. That's not what ChatGPT or any of these new fake AGI projects do.

1
BrikoXreply
vlemmy.net

They add human sounding language generation. You look at it as whole, I'm seeing it as a piece of the puzzle that combined will make the issue from an annoying inconvenience to a real problem.

1
vlemmy.net

I guess you're right, every little helps to make things worse. But as I said the mainstream news sources aren't trustworthy anyways. The media is already ruined behind repair as a source of truth or even valid information.

2

You reached the end

Humans Aren’t Mentally Ready for an AI-Saturated ‘Post-Truth World’ | Spyke