Spyke
lemm.ee

Other kings said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the swamp. So, I built a second one! That sank into the swamp. So, I built a third one! That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp, but the fourth one stayed up!

66
hihi24522reply
lemm.ee

“She’s got huuugeee… tracts of land.”

22
JackbyDevreply
programming.dev

It's even more impressive, right? More like building on the sea, wasn't it?

11
Obireply
sopuli.xyz

It's reclaiming the sea. Build big dykes to cut off a piece of sea from the rest. Pomp water out. You now have new land.

9
fedia.io

Pros +2 to culture +100 yrs longevity of empire

Cons 10% increase to building costs

32

English empire wandering around in a swamp and a watery tart throws a sword at them

17
lemm.ee

But like, I can't blame them. Who doesn't like having access to water? Fixing swampland is a one-time thing.

16

Fixing swampland is a one-time thing.

This comment brought to you by the "fuck wildlife habitat and natural flood control" committee of the American Society of Civil Engineers

14
lemm.ee

True heroes build their capital below sea level.

8
sopuli.xyz

Idk if ancient Rome was ever a swamp? It was famous for it's 7 hills. Unless you mean Ravenna then sure it's 100% swamp.

5
PugJesusreply
lemmy.world

Rome was infamously swampy. Malaria was rampant for just that reason. The Field of Mars itself was pretty swampy.

13

Rome being built only on its seven hills is a common misconception. Moreover it has also always been in the space in between and towards the river Tiber.

6

It's smart. Draining the capital swamp ahead of time prevents dipshits from successfully running on a promise of draining the swamp (exceptions apply.)

4

You reached the end

Swamps have hidden terrain bonuses | Spyke