Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.dbzer0.com

24 replies

lemmy.world

in a just world, every person on that panel who dismissed her concerns would have a black bag pulled over their head and they'd wake up in a prison in El Salvador.

72
lemmy.dbzer0.com

No. In a just world, that prison wouldn't exist.

Human rights abuses aren't justice no matter who they're committed against.

78

the fascists should stand trial at the hague as is tradition

14
SupraMarioreply
lemmy.world

Yes because I remember how the allies defeated the Nazis...with kind words.

Some times those that hurt others only understand the rule of the jungle.

6
the_crotchreply
sh.itjust.works

I remember how the allies defeated the Nazis...with kind words.

It wasn't by throwing them in concentration camps either

15
SupraMarioreply
lemmy.world

Because people wanting to fight fascist have???? Suggested that? I'm a bit confused with your comment here.

-2
the_crotchreply
sh.itjust.works

From the beginning of this chain, the comment I believe you were defending

in a just world, every person on that panel who dismissed her concerns would have a black bag pulled over their head and they'd wake up in a prison in El Salvador.

I feel like "well they did it first!" Is a weak and childish justification for acting exactly like ones' enemies.

8
SupraMarioreply
lemmy.world

Yea not what I'm defending, but the reality is that hoping you can talk your way out of fascism is a joke.

-3

You responded to somebody saying "in a just world, that prison wouldn't exist" with "sometimes those that hurt others only understand the rule of the jungle", and I'm confused as to how you didn't intend that to be in advocacy of unjust prisons?

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Yes because I remember how the allies defeated the Nazis...with kind words.

Holy false dichotomy, Batman! Starting out with a fallacy that bad, I'm hesitant to read on..

Some times those that hurt others only understand the rule of the jungle.

😮‍💨 Should have followed my instincts and spared myself the rallying cry of every violent vigilante and vaguely bigoted Crusader 🙄

No person or society is ever improved by answering atrocities with atrocities.

5
qarbonereply
lemmy.world

Justice isn't necessarily a utopian ideal. Justice only cares about fairness/equality, not what is humane.

-2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Justice only cares about fairness/equality, not what is humane.

Not true. Inhumane treatment is by definition never fair and thus never just.

That you consider that a "utopian ideal" rather than the minimum requirement for civilized humans says a lot about you and whatever society has warped your worldview.

14
qarbonereply
lemmy.world

I think it says more about your reading comprehension than anything.

Justice not necessarily being a utopian ideal means "Justice" isn't necessary for a utopia. "The maintenance or administration of what is just, especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments"(Merriam-Webster) isn't necessary in a utopia. In fact, it's counterintuitive. "Justice" doesn't care if you stole for fun or [perceived] necessity. "Justice" doesn't care if you killed someone for self-defense, anger, or a casual disregard for human life.

Justice and what you're envisioning are as different from each other as "social equality" is from "social equity".

But it was cool of you to take time to climb atop your high horse before misunderstanding.

-1
fedia.io

Every "mistake" is a push to see what they can get away with.

67

When the truth/facts slaps them in the face over and over, they just declare it a lie, and act arrogantly.

5

You reached the end