Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.zip
hardware·HardwarebyBrikoX

Hard Drives Have Less Environmental Impact Than SSDs, Seagate Says

A new report from Seagate reveals that hard drives significantly outperform solid-state drives in environmental impact metrics, challenging common industry assumptions about storage sustainability. According to Seagate's "Decarbonizing Data" report released this month [PDF], standard hard drives produce just 29.7 kg of embodied carbon dioxide compared to a staggering 4,915 kg for equivalently sized data center SSDs.

Hard Drives Have Less Environmental Impact Than SSDs, Seagate Sayshttps://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/04/18/127212/hard-drives-have-less-environmental-impact-than-ssds-seagate-saysOpen linkView original on lemmy.zip
21

3 replies

The article is unfortunately a stub. The original insight stems from the peer reviewed report of Tannu and Nair (2022) and is based on a meta analysis of several life cycle analyses. It’s actually cited and linked in the Seagate brochure:

https://hotcarbon.org/assets/2022/pdf/hotcarbon22-tannu.pdf

Long story short: The reason a combination of the higher production related CO2e emissions and the higher power consumption given the current power mix.

8

I am all for pointing out conflicts of interest, but I bought an SSD external hard drive from Seagate, and just looking up "Seagate SSD" will take you to a bunch of Seagate SSD products. Is there something I'm missing here?

7

You reached the end

Hard Drives Have Less Environmental Impact Than SSDs, Seagate Says | Spyke