Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on feddit.nl

16 replies

Not there yet is relative. They are missing some of the most complex features and services but for 90% of the applications they have what's needed.

19

Hetzner is great and way cheaper than the big clouds. Managing your own servers is a great skill to develop, and you’ll save tons of money too.

15

I love the cost transparency. You will know exactly what the machine is going to cost for a month and will not end up with a surprising bill about logging just because you forgot to uncheck one checkbox.

5

Most of the providers are targeting web hosting and general fairly constant load. We have bursts load and use queue based scaling in AWS. Does anyone know of any service that can do that?

4

They had a fire and they used it to fuck their customers over, kept charging for services that were in the literal cloud for months, with no help from support.

0

I remember OVH being the preeminent server provider back in the early 2000s, before "the cloud" and the big American tech companies took over.

2
feddit.uk

I know this is a little off topic, but what's a good alternative to Backblaze?

I actually think BB are doing good things, ie with their harddrive reports, etc. But, still, I'd like to consider somewhere more local for my data...

3
feddit.uk

Back blaze does backups, right?

For back ups, I use a storage box in hetzner. Dirt cheap and then connect to it using Borg backup. Compresses and encrypts your data

2

You reached the end