Spyke
lemm.ee

Who knew that working people less means they have time to have kids?

48
Xenonreply
lemmy.world

It's always amazing to see study after study confirming totally obvious relationships yet policy makers and corporations still choose to ignore all of it.

28

Who cares that they will have 20% fewer workers in 2+ decades when you could have 2% more profit this year?

5

And yet corporations rely heavily on their shill research study findings to advertise

4
marche_ckreply
lemmy.world

After millenia of human civilization, it took Big Data and AI to finally lead us to this answer/s

6
kbin.social

It really wouldn't be an issue if workplace sex was easily possible. If you spend the whole day there you might at least multitask and make new workers while inputting data into Excel.

3

Office sex DOES exist, but only accessible by the higher echelons of corporate management ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

2

Well considering I saw another post talking about investing in AI and UBI, one can hope.

4
lemmy.world

The 69 hours a week bill got defeated. Apparently someone suggested 69 as a way of getting more babies, and the PM was like "hours of work a week? Deal!"

3
lemmy.world

That the bill got defeated, and that the cap was 69 hours of work is true. Sadly, the rest was a joke.

2

You reached the end

Study: Fewer Working Hours Propel Pregnancy Intentions Among Koreans | Spyke