Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

31 replies

lemmy.world

Genuinely suggesting the government might access your bank account and withdraw funds is fear mongering. I'm very aware of the disappointing and alarming things going on in this administration, but this is definitely not something that would happen to a civilian

52

It's not clear to me what they've done here is not worth fear mongering about. It looks extremely abnormal

65
lemmy.world

When my dad died ss went into my parents joint bank account and withdrew the amount of his latest payment. It's not just fear mongering. It is possible. I don't think even this administration is ballsy enough to do it, though. The backlash would be enormous, and as another poster mentioned civil asset forfeiture already exists.

14
lime!reply
feddit.nu

that just sounds like direct debit. you sure it wasn't pre-approved?

2

That's what I thought, but my mom said the money had already cleared and was removed as a separate transfer.

4

"They would never arrest people with green cards"

"They would never send immigrants to Guantanamo"

"They would never cancel medicaid"

"They would never cancel cancer research"

"They would never drain congressionally-appropriated funds"

"They would never drain a civilian's funds"

You think they'll suddenly stop overstepping? You think they'll suddenly grow a moral compass?

8
greenskyereply
lemm.ee

Also the money came from the government in the first place. That's a critical aspect to this.

-13
legion02reply
lemmy.world

All money comes from the govenment in the first place.

18
greenskyereply
lemm.ee

Yeah. But it makes several pitstops before hitting my bank account. The government pulling back a grant or funding is different than the government taking $500 from John Q Citizen's account

-5

John Q. (formerly Citizen) had citizenship revoked for refusing to demonise transpeople.

We simply removed an upto $500 amount to cover the administration costs of using X-Zen®.

1
lemm.ee

From what I understand, they were only able to do this because the funds were still sitting in an intermediary account and had not been moved into an actual NYC account. If the funds had been moved, they would have had to ask for the funds back from NYC instead of just taking them.

I can't remember if my source was an article or a podcast, but I know it was a few days to a week after the incident happened because all of the initial reporting was framed exactly like this.

35
lemmy.world

Y'all understand search and seizure as well before you give more credit to this. There are other avenues for legally emptying bank accounts, some start like this...

10

196 users when 196 😱😱😱😱😰😰😰😆👉🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💯💯💯💯😫👌😫👌👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

-3

I highly recommend local credit unions, their version of the FDIC is significantly harder to dissolve.

7

No. The IRS will go into your bank account and take whatever it wants.

0
sh.itjust.works

This only supports that they could withdraw money from private bank accounts, not that they have. Yea, if someone in the government wants to fuck your over, there are many ways they can do that.

-26
programming.dev

I was gonna say… I wouldn’t think NYC’s bank account would be completely inaccessible to the US Treasury.

Does this really have implications for private citizens?

(I’m asking a genuine question, here not supporting Musk/Trump or anyone else. I fuckin hate those assholes.)

6
slrpnk.net

They've had the ability to garnish your bank accounts, but there are restrictions on when and how they can do that. The only thing stopping the government from accessing your bank account is the law.

Right now, there's not a lot keeping Musk/Trump from breaking the law.

18

Right. The title of the reddit post says “private accounts” and by any reasonable definition, NYC’s bank accounts are not that.

1

You reached the end