science_memes·Science Memesbyfossilesque i'm gonna need directionsView original on mander.xyz252Comments15
ssleep_deprived lemmy.dbzer0.com"yeah man it's right above [Xe] 4f^14^ 5d^10^ 6s^1^, you can't miss it"30
Sneezycat replysopuli.xyz7Hide 7 replies31 electrons if I can count, so Gallium? Although I'm pretty sure that electron configuration is made up Edit: nvm, see comment below, 47 electrons is right, been a long time since I last did chemistry :P13
mmexicancartel replylemmy.dbzer0.com6Hide 6 repliesTf guys i count 47 which is way above 31&33. How are you guys counting?14
TTempermentalAnomaly replylemmy.world1Hide 1 replyIt's been over 20 years, but why is 5s1 4d10 a correct representation and not 5s2 4d9? Edit: is it because d10 is more stable than d9? But then s1 is less stable than s2.3
mmexicancartel replylemmy.dbzer0.comHalf and full filled configurations are more stable. s1 is still half filled and d10 is full filled. The net effect it better stability even if s became a little less stable4
ffrank replysopuli.xyz1Hide 1 replyYou're right, according to online calcs. But man I can't remember how to count these myself. Wanna explain for someone who didn't have to do much chemistry?2
mmexicancartel replylemmy.dbzer0.comAdd up the superscript numbers. That gives electrons, i.e, atomic numbers.3
oornery_chemist mander.xyzHey look, it's a kürzlich aufgebauter vom Aufbauprinzip verbauter Bau Edit: also, the configuration is referring to silver for those curious. Not my first choice, but whatever floats OP's boat (Baute?) I suppose.13
"yeah man it's right above [Xe] 4f^14^ 5d^10^ 6s^1^, you can't miss it"
Ag, just circle the damn room for me!
Arsenic? Did I count right?
31 electrons if I can count, so Gallium?Although I'm pretty sure that electron configuration is made upEdit: nvm, see comment below, 47 electrons is right, been a long time since I last did chemistry :P
Tf guys i count 47 which is way above 31&33.
How are you guys counting?
Which is Ag, consistent with s1 d10 format
It's been over 20 years, but why is 5s1 4d10 a correct representation and not 5s2 4d9?
Edit: is it because d10 is more stable than d9? But then s1 is less stable than s2.
Half and full filled configurations are more stable. s1 is still half filled and d10 is full filled. The net effect it better stability even if s became a little less stable
You're right, according to online calcs. But man I can't remember how to count these myself.
Wanna explain for someone who didn't have to do much chemistry?
Add up the superscript numbers. That gives electrons, i.e, atomic numbers.
I'm a musician I count by ear
It's silver
i dont understand this, what kind of polynomial is that
It’s an electron orbital description of an element.
Hey look, it's a kürzlich aufgebauter vom Aufbauprinzip verbauter Bau
Edit: also, the configuration is referring to silver for those curious. Not my first choice, but whatever floats OP's boat (Baute?) I suppose.