With those images, the no lifeguard beach obviously. Looks like a chill beach. They should have drawn it super dangerously, rocks, animals, whatever. Like this its a no-brainer.
No, you don't understand. By not having a lifeguard, the beach is supporting sharks. We need to choose the evil lifeguard beach to persuade the other beach to get a good lifeguard. If they see how much we prefer evil lifeguard, surely they'll get the message that we actually want good lifeguard
With those images, the no lifeguard beach obviously. Looks like a chill beach. They should have drawn it super dangerously, rocks, animals, whatever. Like this its a no-brainer.
Red hats often have trouble with what should be a no-brainer
Thats the point. The red hat is the clue.
And now they'll never be able to reboot Mighty Max
No, you don't understand. By not having a lifeguard, the beach is supporting sharks. We need to choose the evil lifeguard beach to persuade the other beach to get a good lifeguard. If they see how much we prefer evil lifeguard, surely they'll get the message that we actually want good lifeguard
The logical answer would be neither
Well, I might take a walk along the beach without the lifeguard while I call in to report the one allegedly trying to drown people.
Even better
If he's been at it long enough to paint a wooden sign about it, I think the authorities are aware.
If the Lifeguard is a young Sam Elliott from the movie Lifeguard (1976), I'll take the "tries to drown you" and go down saying "choke me harder daddy Elliott."