Spyke
sh.itjust.works

In defense of xfce, it was my main DE for a few years and you can make it look pretty cool with a few CSS rules.

79
navordarreply
lemmy.ml

XFCE has convinced me to switch to Linux. Xubuntu has a nice elementaryOS-like theme by default and apps from the DE are extremely fast.

I really don't understand the hate it gets. Maybe because the defaults aren't that good?

11
jollyroguereply
lemmy.ml

Who is hating Xfce? Besides the “lightweight” DE crowd.

The project doesn’t have a lot resources, so it’s behind on things. They do great work for what they have though.

10
juliebeanreply
lemm.ee

wait, are you saying the lightweight DE crowd hates Xfce? what do they like then?

8
jollyroguereply
lemmy.ml

Yeah, it’s a “middleweight” DE.

LXDE, LXQT, Openbox, i3, Sway, FVWM. That sort of thing.

7
feddit.org

I wouldn't say they "hate" it though. XFCE-components used to be common additions to really lightweight desktops (IDK if they still are, haven't looked into it in a while), because they can actually be used on their own (unlike most KDE stuff) while still being somewhat lightweight compared to Gnome stuff.

3

Yeah, it’s hyperbola. 🙂

I think most lightweight desktops have invested in their own components or use LXDE. Xfce has some dependencies on Gnome tech, which I believe they pull in.

2

It doesn't have so many essential modern features, kde has hdr, proper fractional scaling, mixed refresh rate displays and is much more secure thanks to wayland, plus the performance hit is tiny these days.

9
Claymorereply
lemm.ee

Wait, you can spruce it up? I've been running it stock for a year now. The design grew on me because it was installed on all the old desktops in my highschool, and I've had it on my laptop ever since.

10
max
lemmy.blahaj.zone

u can very easily theme plasma to be retro so im not sure why it an gnome are included meow.

post kinda smells of 4chan

31
lemmy.ml

I unironically do hate modern UI. I'd love to be able to like windows 98-ify my OS.

12
Valmondreply
lemmy.world

Same here, I always got flak for disabling that transparent shit in vista and onwards, I want to work.

Today I'm a serene Linux Mint user "BTW".

7
lemmy.zip

Didn't those transparent bars come with a massive performance hit? I didn't know anyone who kept it enabled.

3
Valmondreply
lemmy.world

I remember that back in the day it did make a performance hit on some PCs, and there were other problems with screenshots etc. Guess microsoft didn't code it in the most optimal way ...

2

A lot of the GPU drivers back then sucked since it was a rather large departure from how stuff worked under XP.

Like in one release we went from a model where only a single app could use the 3D bits of the GPU at once, to the system itself relying on them to present the UI and letting multiple apps share it at the same time.

2
Swedneckreply
discuss.tchncs.de

honestly those can look really modern if you spend a hot minute configuring them

1

They're actually extremely modern even if you don't configure them at all, they're as far removed from 90s point-and-click UI as possible.

1

They're actually extremely modern, even unconfigured they're as far removed from standard point-and-click desktop UI as possible.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

The thing that really pisses me off is the flat design that is so popular now. It's so hard to tell when something is a button versus a label. I feel like I never know what is clickable or not.

7

the thing is that flat design is way more of a subtle art than skeumorphism, you have to really know what you're doing for it to work well.
With skeumorphism you just slap some shading on it and call it a day, for flat design you have to think about where things are placed and what precise colour they are compared to the background, which icons you use, etc etc..

3

You reached the end