ssmitten replylemmy.blahaj.zone6Hide 6 repliesAh yes, the well known i5.90689059561 Edit: i5.9068905956085185293240583734372066846246458007170616725105090503570330044029837783724202182774583971906380341853094191705416494253244517104173918Reply
u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org) replylemmy.sdf.org4Hide 4 repliesOK, I am dumb. Can you explain what that is?7Reply
ssmitten replylemmy.blahaj.zone2Hide 2 repliesI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length9Reply
ssmitten replylemmy.blahaj.zoneI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks4Reply
llugal replysopuli.xyz1Hide 1 replyI'm writing this comment at 9 pm. What time was it a minute ago?3Reply
16 replies
They're just using French Revolutionary decimal time.
😂
8:99, love it. I'm going to start to use it.
Or the famous saying "It's 11:95"
8:99 = 9:39
Ah yes, the well known i5.90689059561
Edit: i5.90689059560851852932405837343720668462464580071706167251050905035703300440298377837242021827745839719063803418530941917054164942532445171041739
Is this what over-clocking is?
OK, I am dumb. Can you explain what that is?
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
Blud be living in 1795 France.
Took me much longer than I'm willing to admit
can you explain?
I'm writing this comment at 9 pm. What time was it a minute ago?
I read the title in Joel's voice