Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ca

20 replies

Apple maps takes forever to update new information on maps as someone needs to approve it while Openstreetmaps takes less than 5 minutes to update the database.

19
lemmy.ml

Doesn't Apple maps use osm anymore? There was a time they pulled osm data and used it in their map. That's one big disadvantage of the osm license. Anyone even crapple can use the data.

9

Anyone can use OSM as long as they site the source

I don't see that as problematic

7
Zagorathreply
aussie.zone

I recall a couple of years ago some talk about a new open mapping initiative that Apple or some other big commerical players were going to be involved in. Separate from OSM. What ever happened to that?

3

Oh neat. Are their maps actually being used by Microsoft's Bing Maps or other user-facing products yet?

2
lemmy.zip

I'm surprised that Apple Maps has a community that is pretty much Tue same size as organic maps

17

I'm surprised that Apple Maps has a community that is pretty much Tue same size as organic maps

Ftfy

Because like, what is there to talk about?

7
fedia.io

I really want to use organic maps, but no traffic data is such a dealbreaker. Also it had trouble finding the right address sometimes when I tried it.

5

There was talk about implementing traffic data but it would require more funding from donations so that will come later when the project scales up.

The app has recently added traffic signal markers at intersections and has improved the search in the latest update.

More houses will need to be numbered in osm for addresses.

4
pancakereply
sopuli.xyz

You could try Magic Earth.

It uses OpenStreetMaps, same as organic maps, but also has crowd sourced traffic data. I haven't tested it much though so I'm not sure how accurate it is.

2

That's what I use at the moment. It works pretty well, although I would prefer something open source.

2

You reached the end