Found this beauty in one of my old projects from school

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

8 replies

smh, could have used the short form ()=>{ instead of function 😤

I've been coding long enough that I still think of that as a fairly new thing in JS.

Someone's handed me nested base-64 encoded JSON before and to this day I am moderately annoyed at them.

Why settle on cammel case ("saveGame") or upper cammel case ("SaveGame") when you can have one of each?

In German we say "doppelt hält besser". Is there an English saying like that? "Twice is stronger/more stable/holds better."

I WILL NOT USE ANOTHER LINE. I DON'T NEED IT

The best code has the fewest lines.

This is just as easy to write, just as sloppy but hopefully way easier to read.

Game.onload = (data)=>{
let a = data;
a = JSON.decode(a)["saveGame"][0];
a = JSON.decode(a)["SaveGame"];
return a;
}