Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on discuss.tchncs.de

4 replies

lemmy.world

Climate change requires every solution and then a couple more. There is no "less impactful than" with climate change mitigation/reversal. We need all of it and then some.

6

The problem is not with people focusing in reforestation. It's with corporations using the funding of reforestation to greenwash or "balance" their more harmful practices. The point is that they need to stop doing harm. After that, how they choose to do good is a secondary issue.

7

The most pertinent part of the equation is that it is not profitable on any timescale businesses consider relevant.

It doesn't matter what intrinsic value something has. What matters is how much value you can convince external parties to invest and commit .

0

You reached the end

Extensive afforestation and reforestation can brake global warming | Spyke