llowleveldata programming.dev4Hide 4 repliesHe's technically correct. The best kind of being correct.65
MMHanak replylemmy.world1Hide 1 replyHey do you think they are technically correct, which is the best kind off correct?7
55714 lemmy.dbzer0.comI mean the question is kind of virgin as well. "...in bed" Is it the 1950s or something? Don't they have developed all these euphemisms like dick and wiener et cetera?51
🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆 yiffit.net1Hide 1 replyNobody's dick is that long. Not even Long Dick Johnson, and he had a long fuckin' dick; hence the name.41
pancakes replysh.itjust.worksI think the left number is football fields but I'm not sure about the second...5
He's technically correct. The best kind of being correct.
POV: You are technically correct, the best kind of correct.
Hey do you think they are technically correct, which is the best kind off correct?
Yᵒᵘ ᵃʳᵉ ᵗᵉᶜʰⁿᶦᶜᵃˡˡʸ ᶜᵒʳʳᵉᶜᵗ. ᵀʰᵉ ᵇᵉˢᵗ ᵏᶦⁿᵈ ᵒᶠ ᶜᵒʳʳᵉᶜᵗ.
I mean the question is kind of virgin as well.
"...in bed" Is it the 1950s or something? Don't they have developed all these euphemisms like dick and wiener et cetera?
Nobody's dick is that long. Not even Long Dick Johnson, and he had a long fuckin' dick; hence the name.
John dillerman (a Danish TV show for kids, look it up)
You are high when you are alive ant long when you are dead.
Bury me upright so I don't have to take Satan's shit lying down
Ant long seems like it would be short.
I assumed this was a chat between two men tbh
Plot twist: his penis is literally 6’4”
Wait... That isn't normal?
I dunno. Imperial measurements make no sense.
I think the left number is football fields but I'm not sure about the second...
The correct response is "suck it and see"
Ah, the ol' paddlecock.
Reddit humor
Reddit humor