Party for Socialism and Liberation, Green Party discuss priorities for 2024 election
https://www.wabe.org/party-for-socialism-and-liberation-green-party-discuss-priorities-for-2024-election/Open linkView original on lemmy.worldSyndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.
View original on lemmy.world
https://www.wabe.org/party-for-socialism-and-liberation-green-party-discuss-priorities-for-2024-election/Open linkView original on lemmy.world
15 replies
Here's a priority for them: drop out endorse Kamala. Stop sapping votes from the left, you'll let Trump win the electorial college and doom the world.
Personally, I applaud the third parties’ attempts at breaking up the duopoly. It’s about time someone challenges the status quo instead of blindly endorsing it.
That's a very woke sentiment but your bio says you're anti-woke.
How do you explain this apparent contradiction?
Yeah that’s what they said in 2016, and guess what happened …
And I voted for them then too. No regrets.
You call it tilting at windmills, but I call it fighting for real change—if these parties weren't a threat to the status quo, they wouldn't be so furious about their presence on the ballot!
State-Level Green Party Officials (Former)
Current Green Party Mayors
Former Green Party Mayors
Current Green Party City & County Council Members
Former Green Party City & County Council Members
Other Green Party Local Officials (Current)
Other Green Party Local Officials (Former)
Awww, thank you!
OR… I just haven’t changed my mind, and I’m voting for who I want, as is my right. Just like you’re voting for who you want, and that’s your right too. :)
Whether it "baffles" you or not, I’m still not voting for your candidate.
::: spoiler WABE - NPR - Atlanta - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for WABE - NPR - Atlanta:
::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://www.wabe.org/party-for-socialism-and-liberation-green-party-discuss-priorities-for-2024-election/ ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support
To save you all some time:
I posted an article that's already widely available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy. I didn’t write it or create the content. It's already out there for anyone to see, so all I did was share it here for discussion. If you disagree with the article itself, that's fine, but calling for it to be censored or accusing me of pushing an agenda simply because it's not what you want to read is misguided and lazy. Open debate requires different perspectives, not shutting down content you don't like.
It's not my job to convince you that I’m not a Republican, that I don’t live in Russia, or that despite posting hundreds of socialist articles to the socialist community, I’m somehow not a socialist. If that’s what you want to believe, cool, then go ahead and think that. Not my problem. :)
If you’re getting worked up over a news article I didn’t even write, that’s on you. Be mad if you want, but I'm under no obligation to prove anything to you. I’ll share my opinion, and you can take it or leave it. Either way, not my problem.
In the past, when I’ve tried to defend myself, people accuse me of not listening. If I stay quiet, they take it as guilt.
Here’s the deal: I’m still going to post what I want in this community because what I’m posting fits within the theme and guidelines of this community which celebrates diversity of thought and opinion.
So, go ahead and expect me to copy and paste this comment into the many, many arguments you’re going to try and start. Whether you believe me or not, I don't have to prove anything to you. I’ll share my opinion, and you can take it or leave it. Not my problem. :)
Wherever you live and whatever you believe in maybe take a break and go touch some grass.
Two thousand one hundred and eighty submissions in twenty-six days is roughly one every seventeen minutes.
Trust me, as much as I get accused of being a troll, I'm sure the mods know all about me. And I'm still here. You know why? Because I'm not a spammer and not a troll. Feel free to check out the modlog. It's public.
Wouldn't it be lower effort if I didn't respond to anyone?
Here, let me save you some time, here is my comment history: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Comments
And here is my post history: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
So which should I do? Not reply and be guilty by silence. Or reply to the exact same accusations every comment, but with a different reason every single time? And then get called stupid for not understanding?
OR, ok, and this is the one I'll do, I'll just continue doing as I do. Posting political news articles (that I didn't even write by the way) from WAY more publicly read websites than Lemmy, to this political news community.
It's not my role to prove or disprove anything not you. I post the articles, I didn't create them. If you don't like the article's content or think there is error in it, please feel free to contact the editors or news org with your concerns.
If you don't like what I post or what I say, please feel free to block me. Thank you!
Take a look at my post and comment history, it's in my profile. I have replied plenty--and I have even gotten criticisms like, "The fact that you feel the need to reply to every post, is sad and shows you how narcissistic you are!!"
Do you think this is my first post to this community?! lol