The Fediverse name and logo are fine. Leave it alone. Changes to brands only serves to confuse the unknowledgeable. Let's not do that.
The Fediverse name and logo are fine. Leave it alone. Changes to brands only serves to confuse the unknowledgeable. Let's not do that.
Thanks.
12 replies
@[email protected] why the change? Who's doing it?
@[email protected] there's a bit of discourse on the hashtags I used regarding the logo today.
The name discourse has been a thing for months now. They keep trying to change it to "Social Web" because normies gotta stink up the naming of things so they can use "easy" words.🙄🤦♂️
@[email protected] social web is the biggest branding turd I have ever heard of
"Social Web" sounds awful.
I hope the Fediverse stays true to current it's glorious self, and welcomes normal folks later, when they stumble into the light, out of the burning wreckage of the crap they're using now.
@[email protected] Fediverse on the other hand is wonderful
@[email protected]
Fediverse has a logo??
@[email protected] yep, Sure does!
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fediverse_logo_proposal.svg
@[email protected] 🤷♂️ personally, if it's something that's off-putting to look at, use, and explain, I will do none of the three.
The current logo looks appealing to me, which makes it easy to use and then makes me want to explain it because it's interesting.
⁂ is not interesting in the slightest to me.
@[email protected] the issue is, it strips out the diversity and interconnectedness of the logo, which is the point of Fedi....
@[email protected] :fediverse:
💖
@[email protected] I thought it is called Mastodon?
@[email protected] :lul: