Spyke
feddit.uk

The water company, which has said it could run out of cash by next June, had asked the regulator for permission to charge customers £156.6m through bills to plug the pension shortfall.

I think the phrase is "fuck you".

30

Its almost like handing out control of something as critical and a natural monopoly as water supplies to the Saudi's is a bad idea.

FYI they also paid their Saudi overlords £37 million earlier this year.

The Aussie owners before them milked it and generated most of this debt.

19
lemmy.today

"In June, the Guardian revealed that Thames’ board approved a £150m dividend ..."

So they approved a 150m dividend while knowing they had a 156m shortfall in their pension system. What the...

21

Welcome to capitalism. Where the only people to win are the shareholders.

4

IIRC, since privatisation the total amount of water company debt is roughly equivalent to the total amount paid out in shareholder dividends in the same timeframe

3

Well, bit of good news for you there – included in Labour's Kings Speech was a bill to make CEOs of water companies individually criminally liable in egregious cases of sewage pollution etc.

3
lemm.ee

(((Nationalise))) (((Water))) (((companies)))

5

You reached the end

Thames Water barred from billing customers for pension shortfall | Spyke