US Supreme Court declines to halt Trump's sentencing in hush money case.
https://www.voanews.com/a/us-supreme-court-declines-to-halt-trump-s-sentencing-in-hush-money-case/7731014.htmlOpen linkView original on sh.itjust.worksSyndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.
View original on sh.itjust.workshttps://www.voanews.com/a/us-supreme-court-declines-to-halt-trump-s-sentencing-in-hush-money-case/7731014.htmlOpen linkView original on sh.itjust.works
41 replies
Fuck off, Missouri. You don't get to interfere with another state's internal judicial procedures and it's outrageous of you to try.
The Missouri AG ought to be ejected for this ridiculously basic gross incompetence.
If we did that to every AG that demonstrated that kind of behavior, there wouldn't be any AGs across the entire south.
Don't threaten me with a good time!
I'm right there with you. My AG is fucking felonious impeached but still in office Ken Paxton.
You’ve convinced me. This should be done.
Hard agree.
Reconstruction 2: Electric Boogaloo
I ain't asking for carpetbaggers, just, you know, not criminals.
Well shit, Ken Paxton ain't gonna like that!
The list of things Ken Paxton likes is power and money, so yea.
Don't forget Utah and Idahore.
Can confirm.
Source: lifelong Missourian
If you said that out loud, would you have said, "lifelong Mizzuran"?
Ah, I see you have met my countrymen. I'm in St. Louis, so I escaped the accent that is prevalent in the center of the state.
Er, I mean, yes. Here in Mizurrah, we talk like that. now i have to go warsh my car before I go drive on highway farty-far.
Fucking liar. No one washes their car before driving on 44. Now if you said you were going to get a ball peen hammer and put a few cracks in the windshield of your Nissan Altima, some heavy dents in the body, remove the quarter panel on the passenger side, and smash in one of the two headlights...then I would believe you. But you would also need to be driving with a temp tag and merge without looking while going 87 in a 55.
This is were the SC gets to pretend to be fair and balanced, rather than partisan extremists because they also ruled against Trump. When a more serious challenge comes in, watch them make an outrageous ruling in Trumps favour.
Again.
Texas AG is mad you ignored their subpoena to Washington.
Still, what do you suppose the punishment will be this time. 1 slap on the wrist, or two?
Lock him up. If you can't do the time don't do the crime. His cultists can hear from him again once he gets out, or if he texts from a cell phone smuggled up his arse.
Sounds like the SC doesn't think Trump's going to win either.
Ok, so when is the sentencing? *taps watch *
September 18th, as stated in the article.
What article?
Am I misreading the article? This seems like good news that means that sentencing can proceed, but the comments are all negative.
My negative comment, at least, was about how ridiculous it was that the court even had to rule on this issue in the first place, not that they (somewhat miraculously) got it right.
Ah I understand now, thanks for the explanation
Womp womp
Where's Flying Squid with Riker?
Hey at least they got it right. Silver lining and all that
Do they have the authority?
::: spoiler Voice of America - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for Voice of America:
::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://www.voanews.com/a/us-supreme-court-declines-to-halt-trump-s-sentencing-in-hush-money-case/7731014.html ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support
In what ridiculous fantasy world is VOA LEAST BIASED??!?? They're state-owned media! They do good factual reporting, but they're US biased to the core! That's they're whole damn job!
THATS THE FIRST. SENTENCE. OF THEIR CHARTER.
Look their work is good and they are important, but just what the hell does MBFC think "bias" means??
From their methodology page.
They aren't rating for any and all bias. They are rating for political bias within the context of the US political landscape.
Which makes it even more absurd considering some of their other ratings. They rate The Washington Post as leftist. The Washington Post. The newspaper for respectable Republicans owned by the platonic ideal of a capitalist. The newspaper every movie and television show in the nation uses to show what the Republicans think about something while they use the New York Times to show what the Democrats think about something. When they say they're telling you the US political landscape they're just lying. It's a garbage bot using a garbage source.
That's not even to speak of all the other terrible problems with this source that have been documented by others elsewhere which I encourage you to read.
Yeah, if I wanted a paper as a capitalist/conservative symbol, I'd use the WSJ.
Anyway, MBFC is garbage and this bot is actively harmful.
You should make a better bot :)
A bot for what? Just posting a comment every time saying "consider the source" or something? Because there is no truly unbiased evaluation of sources.
But TV and movies disagree with you so you're wrong
The Conservative newspaper in DC is The Washington Times
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times
And in NYC, the Conservative paper is the New York Post
(Once you click the other link to Wikipedia, you can go look it up yourself without having to actually look at with paper.)
So:
In NYC, Times <=> Post
In DC, Post <=> Times