Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

17 replies

DogPeePoo
lemm.ee

538 had Hillary beating Trump in 2016.

Polls are shit, have a plan and get out and vote.

VOTE!!!

29
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

538 had Hillary beating Trump in 2016.

No they didn't. They had Hillary with something like a 60% chance of winning. That's not "had Hillary beating Trump" that's "Hillary was more likely to win than Trump."

8
Ben Hur Horse Racereply
lemm.ee

I dont have proof, but I believe it was a hell of a lot higher than 60％

4
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

You know how probability works right? No, of course you don't. Almost nobody does...

5
Pheonixdownreply
lemm.ee

Some of us play XCOM, 95% chance to hit might as well be 0% when you need 100%, usually means it's time for a grenade.

3
TheEtherBunny
lemmy.world

The very idea that 50% of any uncontrived sample of people in the USA would vote for that compulsively lying wannabe dick-tater is appalling.

11
Cam
lemmy.world

Elections aren't real. The fraud in the 2020 elections should have told Americans that elections do not matter going forward.

-35
AFK BRB Chocolatereply
lemmy.world

What a lot of bullshit. You realize that even the Republican-led investigations found no evidence of Democratic election tampering, right? The only election fraud of significance was by Republicans.

17
davel [he/him]reply
lemmy.ml

How can mirrors be real when our eyes aren’t real?

People are reporting your comment, but I kinda want to keep it because QAnoners almost never show up here and it’s funny.

You’re not entirely wrong about elections being a fraud, though[1][2].

6
Camreply
lemmy.world

I kinda want to keep it because QAnoners almost never show up here and it’s funny.

Not a Q follow. Q is propaganda

-3

You reached the end

Harris and Trump are tied in 538's new polling averages | Spyke