Spyke

Sorry, typos in the headline. Of course I meant the one that actually exists.

3
Pilireply
lemmygrad.ml

China deradicalisation bad

Murican torture good

-3
benderreply
infosec.pub

Not sure where in posting a link about China’s massive, well-documented genocide did I say anything about my position on Guantanamo, but keep going after those straw men, you’ll beat them one of these days.

2
Blurstyreply
lemmygrad.ml

The reason why it's the worst documented genocide in recorded history is because it never happened. It was a complete hoax, end to end. Even the US doesn't claim it anymore.

But anyway, this article is about America's extrajudicial Muslim torture camps.

-2

Why link to a Chinese site? Link to a US .gov site instead if you want to talk about the US position.

3
benderreply
infosec.pub

But anyway, this article is about America’s extrajudicial Muslim torture camps

Oh, then maybe you should delete this post and give it the correct title.

1
Blurstyreply
lemmygrad.ml

Too late now. The wheels are in motion. It would be unfair of me to waste all the effort people have already put in.

-3
benderreply
infosec.pub

Then I guess the people will just have to discuss the topic as written, and talk about China’s detention and torture of Muslims. Glad you’re bringing attention to it!

1

But there won't be anything to discuss about it, except maybe the complete lack of any credible evidence. We could discuss Sasquatch man instead I suppose, since there's far more evidence for him.

0
lemmy.world

Did you read your own source?

The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

-11

Yes I read that part. They have no evidence but still want to pretend to believe it, like so many others.

0

So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you're saying?

-6
benderreply
infosec.pub

Not here for a debate OP, just here to post the information you promised and didn’t. As a bonus, I gave you a primary source instead of a propaganda rag!

I’m sure other people here enjoy arguing against someone with the IQ and demeanor of a brick wall, but if I wanted that, I’ve got four right here.

2
Blurstyreply
lemmygrad.ml

Not here for a debate

Sir, this is the internet.

You should understand that your report is not a primary source. It cites one single primary source, the ASPI, a propaganda rag.

-1
benderreply
infosec.pub

The official UN news site isn’t a primary source for UN statements on China’s genocide, you got me. I cede all of my points.

Sir, this is the internet.

Yeah, and the internet is for porn, not debating deluded people on the internet.

2

Looks like you're here for a debate after all! Porn and debate, together at last! The debunk gets everywhere.

You missed my posting above of a thorough discrediting of that report. Believing what you want to believe despite all the evidence (or the complete lack of) is definitively delusional.

-2

You reached the end

UN Human Rights Expert Calls for Immediate Close of Xinjiang Muslim Detention and Torture Facility | Spyke