Discuss.
wprogramming_languages·Programming Languagesbywargreymon Why python while Julia is so much better?Discuss.View original on sh.itjust.works-23Comments16Reply
ericjmorey replyprogramming.devThis is the biggest factor. Also Julia's ecosystem is in infancy in comparison.2Reply
rrefalo programming.dev1Hide 1 replyWhy python while $subjectively_better_thing is so much better?13Reply
wwargreymon replysh.itjust.works1Hide 1 replyRust code is lot more verbose and much harder to learn bc ownership 🤷-3Reply
ericjmorey programming.dev2Hide 2 repliesIn what ways do you see Julia as better? Better for what?6Reply
ericjmorey replyprogramming.devYour reply is a lazy and uninformative answer that I'm inclined not to take seriously.2Reply
BBen Matthews sopuli.xyzI'm happy with Scala3 - whose syntax is easy to read like python, but compiler and tooling now smart, fast and safe, and also compiles to JS for the web.1Reply
16 replies
Somebody woke up and chose violence.
I already know Python, for one
This is the biggest factor.
Also Julia's ecosystem is in infancy in comparison.
Why python while
$subjectively_better_thingis so much better?bc dynamic typing is for nubz LOL
Not as many libraries and other tools for it.
Why use Julia when Rust is so much better?
Rust code is lot more verbose and much harder to learn bc ownership 🤷
Nah
In what ways do you see Julia as better?
Better for what?
every aspect
Your reply is a lazy and uninformative answer that I'm inclined not to take seriously.
Better question: Why Fortan and not Julia?
runs better on punch cards
RPython.
I'm happy with Scala3 - whose syntax is easy to read like python, but compiler and tooling now smart, fast and safe, and also compiles to JS for the web.