Cruelty-based intervention: Russia is set to reintroduce antipsychotic drug as autism treatment
In the spring of 2024, the Russian Society of Psychiatrists (RSP) proposed new clinical guidelines for the treatment of pediatric autism. If the changes are adopted, starting in 2025 all Russian doctors will be required to prescribe haloperidol to children diagnosed with autism. The drug is ineffective for treatment and has many side effects, experts warn. It is expected that, once the new system is introduced, autism will be diagnosed even less frequently in Russia — it is already diagnosed tens of times less frequently than in the United States — and autistic children will be deprived of chances for social adaptation. Both tutors and parents of children with autism fear that the new initiative will result in the exclusion of special-needs children from society.
-
If the Ministry of Health adopts its new guidelines, modern approaches will give way to Soviet-era methods — specifically, the use of a potent first-generation neuroleptic called haloperidol (also sold under the brand name Haldol). Adherents of modern behavioral management therapy approaches for ASD condemn these recommendations, calling them “medieval” and comparing them to treating mental disorders with lobotomies.
-
What is even worse, starting from 2025, the Ministry of Health's clinical guidelines will become mandatory for all medical professionals in Russia.
-
Even before the new regime goes into effect, the human cost of Kremlin policy is already being felt. In April 2024, the Denisovs (their name has been changed), a young family raising a child with ASD in the north of central Russia, were granted a place in a special rehabilitation center in a neighboring region. A few days before the trip, they were shocked to learn that the invitation had been postponed until at least the summer — the facility had to accommodate children from nearby Belgorod, a city close to the Ukrainian border that had been under frequent missile and drone attacks.
-
A private child psychiatrist who agreed to speak anonymously criticizes the use of drug therapy with haloperidol when used as the primary treatment for ASD:
"The worst thing about treating [autism] with haloperidol is that it is ineffective. A drug must target a specific symptom. In the case of antipsychotics for ASD, it's aggression. However, there is insufficient evidence that haloperidol helps with aggression in children with ASD — while its side effects are pronounced.”
-
The RSP authors’ recommendation of haloperidol is based on a single study from 1984, meaning that the work is irrelevant by modern medical standards. The authors claim that the drug has no side effects — this despite the fact that even the outdated study they cite describes multiple.
-
Lena Urdina, child psychiatrist and the author of the Telegram channel No Stigma, said:
"Russia’s healthcare system appears to follow the principle of discouraging patients from seeking medical advice and encouraging them to quietly die at home, without occupying a hospital bed. Mental health care was once provided to people who were deemed ‘dangerous’ to society. People who experienced ‘vital suffering’ were more likely to seek psychotherapy than psychiatry."
https://theins.press/en/society/272364Open linkView original on feddit.de
14 replies
This isn't just cruel, it's actually actively disadvantaging Russia in a huge way.
Anyone can be a scientist, and autistic people can go into any profession, but statistically speaking, autistic people tend to be the ones willing to obsess over data enough to get into science and make technical breakthroughs.
Sure, a lot of other countries aren't exactly saintly when it comes to treating people who act a bit different, but good fucking luck building a tech industry that can compete with the world's dominant powers if you're actively removing people that aren't perfect little obedient clones of the ideal citizen.
Is this eugenics?
Not quite (eugenics refers to controlling human reproduction) but not any better.
Not that far if a part of a population gets further disadvantaged and therefore excluded from the genetic pool, although indirectly. A choice of either no therapy or constant sedation greatly reduces their chances to find a partner in their adult life.
I mean, I suppose you're not wrong, I just don't really see the point of bringing up that angle specifically. Would this be ok to do to people who had no interest in relationships or children?
Intentionally placing them in that position wouldn't be ok whatever their own reproductive plans are or would be, imho. I singled out that aspect for the sake of trying to couple it with eugenics.
Horrifying
That's alarming on the face of it, but not so far from clinical practice in the "West", if we're talking severe autism where the person is constantly agitated to the point of self-injurious behaviour. I imagine quetiapine is getting handed out pretty frequently, which is better on paper, but basically the same idea.
The operative word is "mandatory". Medical professionals should have a level of discretion available to them, since not all treatments work for all people, even if it wasn't such an ineffective treatment being discussed.
Imagine being so much of a Russophile that you are forced to defend MANDATORY antipsychotics for neurodiverse people.
I get disliking the west but this dose not mean one can ignore harm when you see it outside of the west.
Oh right, mandatory. Missed that bit.
Staggers me that it gets used as a sedative, but I guess... evidence-based medicine, it clearly works for that. Makes me uneasy though.
Interesting, in the UK they'd do something similar such as olanzapine with lorazepam. Quetiapine really is the one I've got a bee in my bonnet about. I don't know about the USA but in the UK it gets over-prescribed just for the histaminergic component which I feel should be considered as more of a side effect. Bear in mine my knowledge is around twenty years out of date!
Thanks for the response.