Southern Baptists Vote to Oppose Use of I.V.F. as ‘Fetal Personhood’ Gains Momentum
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/12/us/ivf-vote-southern-baptists.htmlOpen linkView original on lemmy.world173
Comments10https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/12/us/ivf-vote-southern-baptists.htmlOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
Most racist people I’ve ever met.
Naturally. The Southern Baptists only exist because they wanted slaves and the regular Baptist churches were against it.
This opposition doesn't even make sense. Isn't the whole point to increase the flock?
If a man didn't get sexual gratification from making the baby what's the point? - every conservative ever
I know two women who are single mothers by choice thanks to IVF. Certain religious groupsfrown upon that kind if thing.
These stupid privileged cunts couldn't even spell in vitro fertilization for $1,000.
I'll give them this- they really don't care if a position is wildly unpopular.
Why are Southern Baptists against premarital sex?
It leads to dancing.
Just remember that if you take a Southern Baptist fishing, you need to take two Southern Baptists fishing. If you only bring one, he'll drink all your beer.
This sounds like a step right toward that Handmaid's Tale future 🤮