Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

42 replies

Make sure this shit plays everywhere all the time. Include citations with links. Paint the walls with his wrongdoing. I want his supporters to see this shit on the inside of their eyelids.

Cause I just spent 4 hours 2 nights ago trying to convince some childhood friends to change their minds, they read all the fucked up plans and said it was fucked up and chose to believe he wouldnt do Project 2025. The only way to save these people is to crack through that outer layer and seed the shame into their bones. Even then, we'll still be getting by on the skin of our teeth.

18
lemmy.world

Yeah yeah, more Biden more military spending. Just what the left leaning voters want.

-83
Brokkrreply
lemmy.world

This would be campaign spending, not military spending. Even if it was, the budget is decided by congress, not the president.

Some these Russian trolls are so terrible.

46
blazerareply
lemmy.world

Biden is telling us hes going to, like he did this term, push for more military spending, he's all about military and wants more of it. And the president has a huge impact on the defense budget, being the one to request the amount, especially as a democrat president that will get democrat reps voting in favor of his higher requested budgets.

-37
blazerareply
lemmy.world

being similar to Trump is not gonna win any approval from me.

-15
Wrenchreply
lemmy.world

Nothing is going to win approval from you. You have already made your decision.

6
blazerareply
lemmy.world

Im out here bringing up policy specifics and metrics and substantiating why i dont approve. You come in with nothing but a broad dismissal.

-3

Am I wrong? If Biden cured ass cancer tomorrow and made the cure free for all Americans, would you realistically change your mind?

1
jumjummyreply
lemmy.world

Yet fools like you just blabber on and offer no real solutions. BoTh SiDeS every time.

6
blazerareply
lemmy.world

I offer the same solution you do. Vote for my preferred candidate.

-2
lemm.ee

Which generates good paying jobs for Americans, gives Ukraine our old weapons that are still very effective against Orks while simultaneously re-arming our own military with new weapon systems based off what the war in Ukraine is showing us.

If the Republicans haven't sided with Russia and held up weapons for so long, that war would have been over by now.

31
blazerareply
lemmy.world

Good paying jobs is such a bullshit answer. Its what the coal industry keeps saying. Make different jobs that dont involve bombing brown people in other countries

-20
blazerareply
lemmy.world

Damn i missed Putin getting bombed by US military?

-14
gruereply
lemmy.world

Work on those reading comprehension skills. This discussion is in the context of the US supplying weapons to Ukraine, so that they can (hopefully) bomb Putin.

7
blazerareply
lemmy.world

I tell you what, im on board with bombing Putin and empowering Ukraine's military. We can give them enough funds and enough weapons to surpass all of Russia, id rather Zelenksy have them than us. And we can drastically cut our own defense spending, and still have a larger budget than Russia and our newly funded Ukraine combined.

-3

Trump wants to cut sending money to Ukraine, so I'm confused what the fuck you have been saying all over this shit website.

1
lemmy.world

You obviously didn’t read the article.

On Friday, the Biden team leaned in to drawing a contrast between the two candidates, sharing a news clip of CNN’s Wolf Blitzer characterizing a “split screen” between Biden and Trump. Pointing to the former president saying that revenge “sometimes can be justified,” Blitzer remarked: “Trump is talking about revenge while President Biden is honoring the Greatest Generation during the 80th anniversary of Normandy.”

14
blazerareply
lemmy.world

All the stuff with Biden praising the military and pointing out Trumps dismissal of current military. Bidens very pro military and increases defense spending

-24
lemmy.world

He was praising the WWII veterans for fighting the Nazis. Read the article again.

23
blazerareply
lemmy.world

I think you need to if you think he was exclusively talking about WWII veterans

-23
lemmy.world

That’s true. It also mentioned Trump refusing to visit the WWI casualties buried in the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery and Memorial in France.

My point is there’s no mention of increased military spending in this article.

21
blazerareply
lemmy.world

Its just gonna be shocked pikachu faces all around when he increases spending again.

-13

You seem confused. Nobody is discussing increased spending in our defense budget except for you and nobody has attempted to refute your remark.

10

You reached the end