Spyke
lemmy.ml

It's an older interview, but I like to bring this up whenever Kaspersky comes up as a topic:

If you had the power to change up to three things in the world today that are related to IT security, what would they be?

Internet design--that's enough.

That's it? What's wrong with the design of the Internet?

There's anonymity. Everyone should and must have an identification, or Internet passport. The Internet was designed not for public use, but for American scientists and the U.S. military. That was just a limited group of people--hundreds, or maybe thousands. Then it was introduced to the public and it was wrong…to introduce it in the same way.

84

Yeah, I sure as shit wouldn't use the internet if it wasn't anonymous, seems like a weird thing to want when people are more concerned for their privacy than ever before.

20
0nekoneko7reply
lemmy.world

malware for linux system exists. maybe you're just ignorant of it.

-67
Norgurreply
fedia.io

How is Microsoft related to a tool to scan Linux for malware?

59
lemmy.ca

Wer're aware of it, comrade.

Gasoline is not the solution to a small fire.

10
lemmy.today

Kaspersky actually has a good track record of NOT being anything malicious (Except for old times when it seemed to flag pirate software quite often).

However, if the tool is closed-source, this is naturally against Linux ethos and is generally something to avoid, given extensive permissions.

50

They actually had a good track record but I think a FSB stooge took a board position and at that point...

4
fschauppreply
lemmy.ml

Well, on the other side I have Steam and most of the games there are closed source... Yes they run in user mode and (usually) don't have kernel level access.

-5

Yes, kernel level access is what makes it a much bigger deal.

17

To mention anything remotely associated with Russia is to be a paid Putler puppet; a lot of people are saying. See you at Tolstoy & the Dostoevsky book burning.

-1

This is very cool! Is it FOSS though? Kaspersky is doing good stuff, but I Antivirus is also problematic, and has like all the privileges you can get

23
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

Why? It's not hard. They typically hash files and look for hits against a database of known vulnerabilities.

3
slrpnk.net

Yes and if viruses use something like base64 encoding or other methods, the hashes dont match anymore.

As far as I understood it, it is pretty easy to make your virus permanently un-hashable by just always changing some bits

7
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

The xz backdoor was a packaged file distributed with the standard packages though. It would be trivial to find.

2
slrpnk.net

This is obviously not about this known file.

It is about "would this scanner detect a system package from the official repos opening an ssh connection"

1
lemmy.zip

That doesn't work against polymorphic malware

I think the best way is to monitor calls and behavior. Doing that is a privacy nightmare

2
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

Who's talking about polymorphic malware? We were talking about the xz backdoor.

1
  1. I have 0 viruses on my computer
  2. I install Kaspersky to check if I have any viruses
  3. I have 1 virus on my computer
5
feddit.de

AFAIK, clamAV hunts Window viruses, not Linux malware. The linux equivalent I know of is rkhunter.

23
lemmy.zip

There are plenty if Linux end point protection tools. However, I think the best protection is security patching.

For personal use I don't think there is any good malware detection tools. I think you just need to harden your browser and not install random packages from online. Best if you stick with distro repos only.

5
fschauppreply
lemmy.ml

Really? I just found enterprise grade e.g. server security tools. Most sites I found were ourdated, where the Linux EndpointSecurity tools were discontinued (even tho the server tools would probably as good as EndpointSecurity)

3
Kaspersky releases free tool that scans Linux for known threats | Spyke