Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ml

7 replies

Elw
lemmy.sdf.org

I’m glad to hear that they are planning to put more effort in to their documentation. The Arch Linux wiki is highly technically detailed, which is great, but can often be very intimidating to new users. I hope Canonical focuses on filling this documentation gap to better serve the new user to Linux.

15
skatesreply
sh.itjust.works

I’ve read little to no ubuntu documentation (aside from stuff like installation and very basic troubleshooting). Have you noticed any improvement to it? I think this post is 2 years old so I’d assume there’d be at least a bit of little change.

6

this post is 2 years old so I’d assume there’d be at least a bit of little change.

wow thanks for pointing that out.

3
feddit.uk

I think the lemmy "Hot" algorithm is still broken. If you scroll much it'll start showing old posts

5

It's a post from 2 years ago, so if nothing changed as of today, well, I think they didn't succeed in updating the docs

4

I had a look at the Ubuntu (deb) packaging docs for a project recently and they're in a shocking state. They rely on tools and commands that have been removed from their respective projects (e.g. bzr/brz deb helper functionality), and to get around that suggest firing up a 5 year old version of Ubuntu in a container.

4

You reached the end

Canonical: Will fundamentally improve the documentation of Ubuntu and other software products | Spyke