This is cool, good news. However, I feel like it's dishonest to not normalize the Y-axis on the charts that are percentage-based. To have "Girls in School" and "Protected Nature" occupy the same absolute top-right position is misleading.
There are people with no vaccination at all in this world?
The graph is specifically "vaccination by 1 year old". In remote/underdeveloped regions, I can imagine that many people might not be able to get vaccinated until later.
I think this is meant to communicate that we’ve solved or are in the process of solving a lot of problems, and so even climate change can be hopefully fixed. And to some extent, I do agree, since doomerism only benefits those who are continuing to exacerbate the climate crisis.
Wrong community
This is cool, good news. However, I feel like it's dishonest to not normalize the Y-axis on the charts that are percentage-based. To have "Girls in School" and "Protected Nature" occupy the same absolute top-right position is misleading.
Well mostly because the graphic is from a few years ago
The immunization graph actually looks depressing to me. There are people with no vaccination at all in this world?
The graph is specifically "vaccination by 1 year old". In remote/underdeveloped regions, I can imagine that many people might not be able to get vaccinated until later.
I think this is meant to communicate that we’ve solved or are in the process of solving a lot of problems, and so even climate change can be hopefully fixed. And to some extent, I do agree, since doomerism only benefits those who are continuing to exacerbate the climate crisis.