Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

6 replies

feddit.uk

Isn’t that basically an admission of guilt? If he did a thing, you can’t say you didn’t if you are arguing you were very nice about doing it. Skirting the “but they enjoyed it” defence is unpleasant

So then it becomes a question on whether he had consent to do the thing? which is a weak argument - I’m sure every abuser will try this one during the trial.

9
substillreply
lemm.ee

It is common for a defendant in a sexual misconduct case to claim it was consensual. That isn’t a new thing. That’s one of the primary defenses.

8

Absolutely, and it’s a terrible defence because without demonstrable evidence of consent, it is the same case as every successful prosecution case ever.

Much easier to prove and argue would be variations on “it can’t be me, I wasn’t there”, and “it goes completely against my character to do this, and everyone can vouch for that”. Both of which are conceded by the “I did it in a romantic way” defence.

2

While it is a common tactic by abusers, the question itself isn't a weak argument but what discerns whether it was sexual abuse or not. That's simple rule of law. False allegations are still a thing, especially towards famous, or rather rich people.

2

You reached the end

Actor Kevin Spacey tells court he touched complainant in 'romantic and intimate ways' | Spyke