Spyke
lemmy.world

I love mulvad. Very unfortunate they hat to stop providing portforwards

78
sh.itjust.works

Eh, it seems like a pretty niche thing. If you still want that behavior, surely you could set up a VPS and forward your own ports, no? With Bitlaunch, you can even disassociate it from yourself if you want.

What did you use it for?

5

Does that mean they would no longer be a good way to torrent my PDFs to my friends?

1
lemmy.ml

Normal ad for a normal thing.

“Uhh, so what kinda ad do you think would really reach your target market?”

“I’m thinking train car mural authored by the most mental illnessed man in town”

55
archchanreply
lemmy.ml

Mayhaps if you had more funnies in your mental, you wouldn't feel so illnessed by the manipulatious nature of their wordiness.

27
lemm.ee

I hate ads on the outside of windows. And they give the little pinholes, like that’s supposed to be enough. The world becomes a blur. Out the window is the least anxious place to look on public transport, but they put ads all over the windows, and give us this pinhole grid crap like it makes up for it.

42

Ads in Windows are infuriating whether you're talking about panes of glass or your laptop.

12
lemmy.today

Yes, the wraps are a total bummer for sightseeing! They are very common in LA though, as not only a means of $$$'s in revenue, but as a cooling measure. The busses and above ground rail with these wraps are much cooler and easier to AC in the summer

10

This looks like something you'd see on /r/schizophreniarides

Side note but has that or InfowarriorRides migrated to lemmy yet?

32

from authorit

every scroll

from ad net

browsing his

control and sh

fight for privacy.

MULLVAD VPN

30
airikrreply
lemmy.ml

Hehe, I know. Just trying to be funny due to boredom :)

3
lemmy.world

One of the things I liked about Mullvad was that they didn't advertise. Has this changed recently or did they always do outdoor ads?

25
Logicalreply
lemmy.world

I've seen their ads in Sweden before IIRC. They don't seem to be very common though. Why don't you like that they're advertising?

22
otterpopreply
lemmy.world

When companies start to focus too much on growth usually they start to lose sight of their values and greed begins to take over. That said I just checked their ad policy and while they do physical ads, it's still a pretty reasonable policy.

They still won't be showing up on random YouTubers videos like Nord

29

Infinite growth on finite resources is such a bad idea on so many levels.

6
sopuli.xyz

They've actually ran adverts at the border of sweden telling politicians and alike that were going there to vote on IIRC ChatControl to vote against it

Mullvad is probably the best example of using ads for something good

2

I agree with that, it's important to consider what's being advertised and in what way.

1
TheFriarreply
lemm.ee

They have a fair amount of ads in nyc.

4
lemmy.world

Mullvad is a good VPN. You might be asking why on a train it's because why not

19

These particular lines are mostly above ground, light rail trains. They are only underground around DTLA

8

Wait, LA had a subway system??

~60 M ridership 109 miles network length

Dayyyuum! Must be nice to always have a seat on your commute.

1
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

Is there even an underground subway in Texas? Asking as someone who used to live there.

4
sh.itjust.works

I don't know why there would be. Texas is big, so overland trains would be much more cost effective.

Tunnels are expensive, and land is comparatively cheap (and we have lots of old rail lines we can reuse).

3
dubyakayreply
lemmy.ca

Subways are usually meant for within city limits to relieve congestion. Not for intercity, so it's irrelevant if Texas is big.

Unless you mean that land with rails within city limits already exists. In that case grade level crossings are a major hindrance.

1
sh.itjust.works

I mean cities in Texas are very spread out. Subways work well in dense areas, and many parts of Texas just aren't that dense. Here's an article about Austin, and it seems people are more interested now than ever. But I want to point to a mention about Dallas:

Basically, the only reason to go underground in the West is when the city can’t get right of way or has to avoid other infrastructure. Dallas’ DART system is the only urban rail system in the Southwest that can claim a subway station. A three and a half mile section of rail runs underneath the North Central Expressway, in order to avoid the right of way conflicts that would come with going through existing neighborhoods. With urban rail projects dating back two decades, Dallas is ahead of the curve in Texas. But Houston’s getting onboard too, according to one of the city’s recent surveys.

We have something similar in my area (also in the west), surface rail is just way cheaper and good enough. Our population is somewhat spread out, so we use streetcars/trams and adjust the lights and crossings accordingly.

3
dubyakayreply
lemmy.ca

The problem with grade level crossings, even if the lights are adjusted, is always rush hour traffic.

One good example of this is line 512, St Clair W of the TTC. It's a street car on well separated tracks but with many intersections due to it crossing dense neighbourhoods in addition to dedicated left/U turn lanes for 2x1 lanes worth of cars. Despite being only 2x1 lanes, the road being on the E-W makes it a major thoroughfare. The congestion can get so bad that at certain intersections the street car can get stuck for ten minutes or more until the blockage clears.

2

I don't know Toronto well, but it seems there's a good set of expressways that go around the city, so thru roads could be cut to discourage cutting through the city itself. Replace those with walking and cycling paths and people will likely use the mass transit a lot more.

Basically, anywhere the Metro goes should have limited car traffic. That way a subway isn't needed, walk ability is preserved, and noise downtown would be reduced, making for a much more pleasant downtown.

If cities prioritize cars, trains will be more expensive and slow, and walking will be more dangerous. If cities prioritize either trains or pedestrians, cars are inconvenienced, but trains are cheaper and nicer, and walking is safe. Unfortunately, we in NA picked cars...

2
BreakDecksreply
lemmy.ml

Because lots of people use Mullvad and think it's neat that there's a Mullvad train. This isn't a sponsored post, people just like Mullvad.

7
lemmy.world

It really turns my head upside down how is this possible, how does a VPN company has enough market / potential customers / money for this.

1
TCB13reply
lemmy.world

Their CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) is usually very high, just think about it. Aside from the subway ads that have ridiculous costs, they usually offer youtubers the equivalent of a year's subscription for each conversion. They also have to factor in operational costs so they've to keep new customers around for 1,5-2 years to reach break-even, only after that they've profit. Their business is based on a CLV (Customer lifetime value) that greatly exceeds the average for a B2C digital service - in order to survive they're either doing shady stuff with your data OR living of VC hype money.

2
communismreply
lemmy.ml

Mullvad only do limited advertising and afaik don't sponsor youtubers

6
TCB13reply
lemmy.world

You call a subway ad "limited"? Are you aware of the prices on those?

0
MrPoopbuttreply
lemmy.world

Compared to how every single video ever is sponsored by nordvpn

5
TCB13reply
lemmy.world

And a whole network subway ad will cost you at least 50k upfront :P

0

$50k isn't that much for a company. Mullvad is pretty popular, so I'm guessing they could afford it.

I've even seen Duckduckgo billboards and whatnot. If they can afford it, so can Mullvad.

2

I don't mean limited by price, I mean limited as in they don't just shove ads everywhere like nordvpn or whatever.

3