Spyke
lemmy.ml

I prefer having one big external monitor with all my windows on it as much as possible, so I’ve turned it off.

2
macreply
infosec.pub

I'm having a hard time picturing this, can you take a screenshot of what you mean by all your windows on the second display?

Surely that ends up looking cluttered?

1
WolfLinkreply
lemmy.ml

Not really. Usually it’s like 2 safari windows and a text editor next to each other. Imagine the screen split into thirds.

On smaller screens I use the feature where it puts two windows side-by-side that each fill half the screen.

2

What's the layout Text editor full height and the two safari windows in half screen

1
lemm.ee

Sometimes useful in certain workflows, sometimes not. It really depends on what I’m doing.

It could use some reworking, but I like the novel approach to window management that also abstracts between whole system WM and app-level WM, which macOS always did with Exposé. It’s much simpler than the more cumbersome approach I’ve seen with other WMs.

2
macreply
infosec.pub

Yeah I think that's probably the best explanation, simple to pick up for new users yet still provides a good amount of power for advanced users without getting overly complex.

1
gregorumreply
lemm.ee

Yeah, that’s a good way to put it. WMs in Linux, like with most features, kinda throw you in head-first into the deep end and can be overwhelming for novices.

Pop_OS’s window tiling system, on the other hand, is a little toned-down but can still be very powerful. From what I’ve seen, the new one coming in their Cosmic DE is even better, and features app-level abstraction in tabbing your tiled windows.

2
macreply
infosec.pub

I tried out Pop_OS recently, functionality wise it's pretty good, I just find the UI very unpleasant to look at unfortunately.

1
gregorumreply
lemm.ee

Well, it’s about to change in April, so you don’t have to worry about that for much longer

1
macreply
infosec.pub

I've seen some screenshots of cosmic and I'm still not a fan of how it looks. Unless I'm not seeing the right screenshots?

1
gregorumreply
lemm.ee

It’s been going through a very rapid, alpha development phase, so some screenshots you have seen me have been incomplete or may have changed since. I really don’t know what you’ve looked at or when. So I can’t say, but you might try looking at it again.

Also, remember, the interface can be customized quite a lot.

1
quokk.au

I leave it off, I don't see much use for it when I can just have separate desktops open for what I need.

What do you use it for that you can't do normally?

1

I like having similar tasks on the same workspace separated by mission control.

So I'd have my programming stuff, editor and browser, then maybe an issue tracker on workspace 1 with mission control to quickly switch between the two. I guess the dock might work for this use but it's nicer to have the context of which apps are in each control space.

Then in workspace 2 I have my calendar and reminders on different mission control spaces so I don't have to have them side by side and can benefit from a more full window size.

TLDR: minimise workspace count by grouping tasks of similar context.

1

I think Stage Manager is great if you only have a single display. Sometimes I will use it at work (computer engineering) to keep my browser tabs with documentation, IDE, and email at arm's reach. If I have access to my dual-monitor setup or an ultra-wide monitor, though, I prefer to keep everything visible or make minimal use of spaces.

1

I find it to be like spaces except I can

Spaces was really good. Like the OG Leopard version, it was really desktop peak performance.

Stage Manager kinda feels like what Windows does when you hover icons.

1

You reached the end