Spyke
feddit.de

Mull (from the DivestOS developers)

But nowadays I'm using a Chromium based browser on my phone because Firefox on Android doesn't support process isolation

35
Dataproletreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

+1 for Mull.

And yeah, on Android unfortunately you gotta choose between privacy (Firefox/Mull) or security (Chromium).

15

Another for Mull and Cromite, here. I don't really use Mull unless I'm looking for absolute compatibility with things like web games.

8

Mull is reasonably secure for most of the people. Only very high targets need that kind of security

6
lemmy.ml

It would still need an Android system/kernel exploit to further escape the system sandbox. It is an important hardening feature, but the browser isn't completely insecure without it

So what? You can go back to firefox for that reasoning unless you are a very very high target

2
feddit.de

Did you read the sentence before that? A malicious website could read data from other websites(opened in different tabs), and also passwords stored in the browser, etc... There is no additional system exploit needed for that

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I use Firefox cause it's easier to get people to switch to something that's already in every app store.

25

IMO, standard Firefox is pretty OK, so I'd rather use that than some weird derivative that has more chances of security issues, breakage, or development halt.

20

Yup. So many of these "alternative" browsers have very questionable security practices. At the very minimum they don't have a staffed team to respond to zero-day exploits. But often they also make large changes without too much consideration for security or disable security features when they get in the way of features. I hate saying "use on of the big boys" but for most users their browser is likely their largest attack surface by an order of magnitude, it's job is literally to download an execute untrusted code and the API surface is huge. It takes real resources and careful development to develop and maintain a browser, and there are very few organizations that I would trust to do this.

So unless you have a strong reason I would highly recommend sticking to one of the major browsers.

4

Mull, but use the DivestOS repository. F-droid also builds it but too much delayed.

6

Mull would be perfect except for the annoyingly slow refresh rate enabled by the fingerprint resistance. It needs to just report a low refresh rate while actually using a higher one.

4
lemmy.world

Stupid as it is my biggest complaint is that none of them seem to have amoled dark mode. Been using and enjoying fennec but I really want my perfect blacks back.

4
lorkanoreply
lemmy.world

People kinda stopped implementing full black once they realized that battery savings between dark gray and black is negligible

6
toastalreply
lemmy.ml

It’s still a measurable difference & it looks nicer having the pixels fully off. No need to dismiss the parent’s preference. Personally, I find the dark gray arguments pretty weak.

3

I’ve read that article several times before (and have written about the topic), but on a global screen usage scale 0.3% is still not 0% so you could argue that if saving power is the goal of using a dark theme on OLED devices, then maximum black would be a most ethical design choice. I will take my 0.3% battery + an aesthetic I like better any day.

1
lemmy.world

You can take a look at FFUpdater on F-Droid. There you can see different browsers for android and information about the features they have.

I'm useing mull.

4

Vanadium is not based on Firefox. Not to mention that it doesn't let you use add-ons, and OP clearly wants them.

6

iceraven

it has a lot of the regular firefox plugins available for installation from the menu. And also some privacy enhancements.

1
lemmy.ml

Kind of offtopic but Firefox has been very unstable for me on desktop... I'm about done with it. (been using it since its initial release)

-9
m-p{3}reply
lemmy.ca

Even with a clean install / profile?

3
authreply

I clear it periodically but I hate to do it because the default settings suck.

2
kbin.social

If you've been using the same OS and computer since Firefox's initial release.

You need a new computer.

1
authreply

well, of course not... probably had 6 or 7...

1

You reached the end