Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

55 replies

eyareply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

i visited this in person, they even sell mini versions of the statue with the cone on the head. kind of weird that the government still considers it "vandalism" at this point

39
bortreply
feddit.de

if they would stop calling it vandalism, it would take away all the fun

44
IninewCrowreply
lemmy.ca

Beautiful, this is why indigenous people loved the Scots and the Irish so much

11
lemm.ee

I'm all for art, but these subsidy hunting pieces need to die already or is gonna be the death of public funding for art itself. If it doesn't convey anything, what is the point of placing it in public?

39
clearleafreply
lemmy.world

They can be interesting for a little while but the artists never seem to be thinking about the people who will have to see it every single day, they only think about themselves and the statement they want to make. It's completely egotistical and creates an environment that feels the opposite of welcoming and inclusive.

22

I like this statement.

In the end every instinct to share something with others is egothistical, since we believe what we find great or interesting must be for everyone else too. Even writing this comment I am convinced that it's worth enough for you to read.

2

I can't agree more. Abominations like these are a waste of material.

1
discuss.tchncs.de

Looks like a....erm..how do I put it....a chocolate starfish that's had a breach.

35

Look, we're all seeing it. Not point in euphemisms c/DontStickYourMileInThatMarker

5
lemmy.world

Well, art is often made for the purpose of provoking questions. I'd say "mission accomplished" here.

23
lemm.ee

These pictures posted in this thread are all definitely "art". You can tell because they clearly provoke emotion, even if that emotion is confusion.

But remember, just because it's art doesn't mean it's good art.

6

But remember, just because it’s art doesn’t mean it’s good art.

That's the point most people in arts love to ignore, it seems.

2

Yeah, it has the typical star shape on the top, plumbuses get, when they turn to fossils

5
lemmy.world

I'm ALMOST sure that's not what a cock is supposed to look like..

Also, "here's the cock" is such a weird sentence fragment regardless of context 😄

18

The sculptor reportedly said:

"Le Coq c'est moi"

"The Cock is me"

Also related:

Coq means rooster in French and is not used as an insult or a euphemism for the penis at all.

But your mileage may vary.

2
Agent641reply
lemmy.world

In Perth we have this weird vagina-like sculpture

7
lemmy.world

And yet you have no problem with that spike being called a dildo?

10

Everything is a dildo if you are brave enough, you can't stick your dick in everything. I don't make the rules, the judge just tells me what they are when I'm on parole.

3
Ashereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I actually really like this one tbh.

I might be biased though because I have a picture of myself slav squatting in front of it with the winter art installation behind me

5

Probably one of the monstrosities Lovecraft described in his stories. I read the stories in French and I could only barely imagine what the f he was talking about but maybe the artist read the first words describing an 'Elder thing' and decided it would look cool ? That or it's meant to represent a fleshy palm tree and the hole in the middle is its gaping mouth ready to devour jaywalkers ?

10
lemm.ee

I've seen some stuff like this being set up in pedestrianization efforts, IIRC it's basically hostile architecture but for assholes who drive too fast in pedestrian dense areas.

8
niftyreply
lemmy.world

How does slow them down? Like they get distracted by confusing or thought provoking art?

1

It's a big fucking statue strategically placed to be an obstacle for through traffic to have to slow down to be sure they're getting past safely

2