Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ca

9 replies

investorsexchange
lemmy.ca

I oppose Poilievre being in government.

It’s hard to understand why his opinion should carry any more weight than mine.

16
kbal
fedia.io

So many words on this topic, so few of them addressing the obvious questions about why doctors might have a use for "puberty blockers" or what legitimate basis politicians could possibly have for wanting to abolish them.

13
m0darn
lemmy.ca

Aren't puberty blockers more reversible than puberty?

12
LostWonreply
lemmy.ca

Yes. So upon seeing that headline, my first thought is that "for kids under 18" is rather suspect phrasing. Like someone wanted to get "kids" in there no matter what.

11
undercrust
lemmy.ca

The decision to use puberty blockers should be based on a conversation between a young person and their doctor, Boissonnault said.

“I don’t see M.D. after Pierre Poilievre’s name or Danielle Smith’s,” he said. “So, not their business.”

THIS RIGHT FUCKIN HERE

9

You reached the end

Poilievre confirms he opposes puberty blockers for kids under 18 | Spyke