Spyke
sh.itjust.works

BRB, on my way to withdraw all funding for an UN agency with 30.000 employees because 12 of them have been denounced by Israel.

153
capitalreply
lemmy.world

The israeli ā€œevidenceā€ has been leaked and confirmed fake

Are the quotes you provided supposed to support the "confirmed fake" part of your comment?

Because "has not seen proof" and "provides no evidence" do not equate to "confirmed fake".

The number of very online people who think countries share their intelligence with every Channel 4 news who asks is a little surprising.

-13
Linkerbaanreply
lemmy.world

No the evidence is fake. Evidence means that you can proof something happened which israel clearly can't.

8
capitalreply
lemmy.world

That’s bold considering all the things people on this site were so sure about only to be proven wrong weeks later.

For me, I’ll wait for the investigation to finish.

-5
Linkerbaanreply
lemmy.world

The "evidence" was already leaked and contained no proof whatsoever. Waiting must be convenient. Are we going to see the Hamas base under the hospital soon?

And it turned out israel lied almost every single time about almost everything.

Let's not forget

But there is a problem with the gut-wrenching narratives that have bolstered the underlying justification for the slaughter of Gaza: They are either complete fabrications or have not been substantiated with a shred of evidence. Many have been thoroughly disproven by major Israeli media outlets.

3

Hamas had command tunnel under U.N. Gaza headquarters, Israeli military says

Reporters on the closely escorted trip entered a shaft next to a school on the periphery of the U.N. compound, descending to the concrete-lined tunnel. Twenty minutes of walking through the stifling hot, narrow and occasionally winding passage brought them underneath UNRWA Headquarters, an army lieutenant-colonel leading the tour said.

So, yeah. I think I’ll wait for the investigation to conclude.

-2
Toldryreply
lemmy.world

The evidence provided by Israel alleging that roughly a dozen UNRWA staffers participated in Hamas’s October 7 terror onslaught is ā€œhighly credible,ā€ US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Monday, as media outlets published additional details on the implicated employees, including photos from an Israeli dossier. ā€œWe haven’t had the ability to investigate [the allegations] ourselves. But they are highly, highly credible,ā€ Blinken said during a press conference

https://www.timesofisrael.com/blinken-says-evidence-of-unrwa-staffers-oct-7-involvement-highly-highly-credible/

-7

I used to have faith that bad people will eventually pay for their crimes. That the weight of their sins will crush them eventually. But these past decades have taught me that the new response to crushing weight of sin is to simply get a stronger spine.

6
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Otoh, Blinken and Biden have parroted everything the IDF feeds them until independent journalists debunk it.

So we've cut funding without conducting any investigation. Great.

20

ā€œWe haven’t had the ability to investigate [the allegations] ourselves. But they are highly, highly credible,ā€ Blinken said during a press conference

This sounds like something The Onion would have written.

15
lemmy.sdf.org

I feel like this is a little too accurate for shitpost. I don't know the proper sub for it, but it's pretty true.

80
Draconic NEOreply
lemmy.world

@[email protected] Maybe you could Crosspost this to ![email protected] if you're on mobile and don't have crosspost button just make a new post using the same link as this post https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/20e095d5-b044-4e69-b1d7-486f63ac3037.png and it'll count as a crosspost. So long as it's the same link.

2
Flying Squidreply
lemmy.world

"Bad faith arguments" is not a reason to flag people in Lemmy Shitpost. Please do not abuse the flagging system again.

8
lemmy.world

Then what good is your moderation? The whole fucking point of having you around is TO police bad faith arguing. That's what mods are FOR.

-15
Flying Squidreply
lemmy.world

Mods are for enforcing community rules. This is a shitpost community, not a debate community. The rules are very clear on the sidebar and 'bad faith arguments' is not one of them.

Feel free to find a different community if you want to report 'bad faith arguments' multiple times. If you do it here, I'm going to tell you to stop before I act. Because I prefer give warnings.

13
lemmy.world

And you can't enforce ANY rule without protecting your people against bad faith arguing. It's a foundation of ALL communities, whether explicitly written in its guidelines or not, because meaningful debate is the foundation of ALL human interaction and is primarily what abuse and harassment is.

The needs of your people are more important than your laziness, selfishness, and unwillingness to do your job. Don't like it? Step the fuck down. You go find a different community to play king over if you don't like it.

-14
Flying Squidreply
lemmy.world

Okay, I think you need to take a break. We'll see you in a week. I wouldn't advise telling another mod to 'step the fuck down.' They might be less lenient.

8
groetreply

I wouldn't advise telling another mod to 'step the fuck down.'

"Dont tell people abusing their power that they are abusing their power or they might abuse their power"

Yeah you should probably step down if that is your opinion...

-8

The weapons embargo in Alderaan prevented those people from handing over the Jedi. The Empire itself maintains that embargo! What were the people of Alderaan to do?

5

I hear at least one of the Jedi was a Sith, good thing they were defunded. Now if we could only defund all the conspiracy theorists about the emperor being a Sith as well.

42

While the real life situation this is based off is quite sad and upsetting...

This is hilarious beyond belief.

6

Oh good I was really thinking my shit posting community needed more agenda posts

-4
infosec.pub

Lol samharris.org

What kind of pretentious loser names an opinion blog site after himself, and bestows a ".org" at the end

The more I read this crap the more obvious it is this bullshit article relies on lengthy annoying paragraphs that no one wants to read and a ".org" at the end to sound more official

Myth #1: Israel is guilty of ā€œgenocideā€ in Gaza.

The term ā€œgenocideā€ has a clear meaning—it’s the destruction or attempted destruction of a whole people.

Yes , 95% of people starving in the world were in Gaza when Israel chose to withhold aid to them. That is the attempted destruction of a whole people

Myth #2: International Humanitarian Law Requires that Israel’s response to Palestinian aggression be ā€œproportional.ā€

I'm as anti Israel as it gets, and I've never heard this argument that you're legally bound to proportional, sounds like this author really likes the title of the blog counting up to 5.

That said, there are tons of MORAL arguments against disproportionately killing civilians, but the only legal one that comes to mind is when Israel evacuated Gazans to a region in the south, then bombed that region with white phosphorus https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-hamas-war-white-phosphorous-gaza-palestinians-amnesty-hrw-reports/

Myth #3: The Jews Are Colonizers and the Palestinians are Indigenous People.

Not the Jews, but, the Israelis are colonizers. Biblically they were a nomadic war faring tribe. They never were a country. The west created a colony to project power in the middle east because they had no other allies there. Israel is a country in a region called Palestine. Palestinians never formed a government that resembled something the west could do business with

In colonialism, the colony has superior technology. The middle east just industrialized, how the hell could Palestinians have been anything but natives the last few thousand years

Myth #4: The atrocities committed by Hamas (and over one thousand Palestinian civilians) on October 7th were a legitimate response to oppression.

Israel left Gaza in 2005—forcibly removing thousands of its own citizens—and billions of dollars in international aid have since been spent there. So the ā€œoppressionā€ of the Palestinians in Gaza—by Israel—is at least debatable.

This is so fucking stupid I'm just going to leave this here. "Oppression" lmao, why the air quotes? Being born in a ghetto doesn't count as being oppressed?

Myth #5: The two sides in this conflict are equally civilized, equally entitled to respect, and equally worth protecting.

I actually agree with this. You can't compare violence between two groups when one group (Israel) is occupying the other (Palestine). The violence from Palestinians against Israel is like violence from black people to the police. It's not good, but it's not the same. One group is oppressed and radicalized from that, the other group is systematically oppressing the other

12
Muehereply
lemmy.ml

Myth #1: Israel is guilty of ā€œgenocideā€ in Gaza.

The term ā€œgenocideā€ has a clear meaning—it’s the destruction or attempted destruction of a whole people.

Yes , 95% of people starving in the world were in Gaza when Israel chose to withhold aid to them. That is the attempted destruction of a whole people

Not sure why you are debating semantics here, as that statement is just straight up wrong, which can be easily confirmed by taking a single look at article 2 of the Genocide Convention (emphasis mine):

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such

3

Here are 10 Myths of Israel (archived) by Ilan Pappe

  1. Palestine was an empty land

  2. The Jews were a people without a land

  3. Zionism is Judaism

  4. Zionism is not colonialism

  5. The Palestinians voluntarily left their homeland in 1948

  6. The June 1967 War was a war of "no choice".

  7. Israel is the only Democracy in the Middle East

  8. The Oslo Mythologies

  9. The Gaza Mythologies

  10. The Two-State Solution is the only way forward

This article, Examining the 10 Myths of Israel is a shorter version of the main points

The book is too detailed to summarize each chapter on a comment, but it's not too difficult to find independent sources to verify each of them

3
lemmy.world

Both Israel and Hamas have blood on their hands. I know we all like the whole Good vs. Bad but in an eye for eye situation, they are both wrong. People, on both sides, suffer. If the politicians would fight on the front, they would be less eager to create these situations.

Edit: I am not defending the Israeli Actions nor the Hamas actions. It is fucked up situation. Israel in the first place, shouldn't have been created. However it is, and they should make the best of it. WITHOUT COMMITTING GENOCIDE. For people who believe in a good God, they sure are willing to kill.

All I am saying is that the ones that are not fighting, are suffering. Rockets land in Gaza, Rockets land in Israel. People, yes on both sides, are dying.

I am against the actions of Hamas, I am very against the actions of Israel.

-27

Israel is not fighting against Hamas. Israel is fighting against all Palestinians, of which only a tiny fraction is Hamas. Well or rather they are fightinf against Hamas, but they are slaughtering the other Palestinians.

Israel is past the need to defend itself. Now they are taking the opportunity to commit genocide and displace the Palestinians from Gaza.

35
throwwyaccreply
lemmynsfw.com

What do you propose Israel do about all of the missiles being fired by Hamas?

-9
???reply
lemmy.world

What do you propose Israel do about all of the missiles being fired by Hamas?

Don't they already have the Iron Dome? That btw lets missiles drop on "poor Palestinian areas" because their systems categorize them as "empty lands"?

What do you suggest they do? Aside from killing every man, woman and child, of course?

14
throwwyaccreply
lemmynsfw.com

I suggest Israel root out Hamas. Then hold elections to create a Palestinian government that's willing to negotiate with Israel for their own state

The iron dome also isn't perfect and doesn't change the intent. If I make my house bullet proof and you shoot it every day in the hopes of killing me at some point I have the right to get rid of you by some method surely?

-4
???reply
lemmy.world

To do "self defence", all Israel had to do was guard its borders and have some diplomatic solution that didn't completely dehumanize Palestinians, maybe policies that listen to expert opinions on these subjects and how this is causing extremism to double. They didn't need to invade "in self defence".

If I make my house bullet proof and you shoot it every day in the hopes of killing me at some point I have the right to get rid of you by some method surely?

Funny how that works both ways.

3
throwwyaccreply
lemmynsfw.com

Alright so from your perspective it seems you expect Israel to do all the heavy lifting here. Just ignore the attacks and hope Hamas is willing to negotiate one day? Even though they make it clear they want to remove Israel

What should the Palestinians/Hamas be doing? Continuing with their current course of action until Israel decides to do something different?

-1
???reply

Giving people rights and ending apartheid and reducing extremism is heavy lifting? As opposed to now???

But yes I expect the supremacist colonial landgrabbers to do the heavy lifting.

3
lemm.ee

I propose Israel stop the weapons embargo on Gaza, allowing Gazans to arm themselves. The embargo obviously doesn’t work for keeping weapons from Hamas. It does, however, make the honest people of Gaza totally powerless to resist their dictators.

9
MyEdgyAltreply
sh.itjust.works

Have you ever wondered what those people might have experienced that would lead them to hate Israel so much?

10
capitalreply
lemmy.world

That's a different point, isn't it? The comment above seems to suggest that Hamas doesn't have support from the vast majority of Palestinians. In reality, if they had weapons, it appears they might use them the exact same way Hamas did.

I was directly replying to that point.

-9

So only 30% of Gazans don’t support what Hamas is doing? Gee I wonder what would happen if 30% of a country rose up against its dictators.

Much tinier percentages of people have overthrown dictators.

If those 70% want to pick up weapons to attack Israel, then at a bare minimum it would mean less injustice in the Israeli bombings. (still massive injustice even if only 30% in an area are non-combatants don’t get me wrong).

Gazans are being held, in a de facto sense, responsible for the actions of Hamas, in the sense they are feelings the attacks meant for Hamas.

But without the opportunity to bear arms, Gazans cannot, in any circumstance, be actually ethically responsible. They are being actively prevented from taking a stance of responsibility because they are actively prevented from having any power.

Weapons are power. Without power they can have no responsibility. And yet they are being held responsible by Israeli weapons. It is unjust.

Gazans should have the opportunity to throw off their dictators. If they take that opportunity, and instead use it to join those dictators, so be it. They can feel the consequences of that. They already are.

The blockade of weapons prevents this situation from resolving in a just way.

1

That's like blaming Jews during world war 2 for putting up resistance against their fascist rulers. It is such a mischaracterization of the situation that it is damaging to the Palestinian people.

25
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

I'm sorry, but whose currently suffering on the Israeli side? Because Gaza is literally starving. And the Aid trucks are idling at the border with food that the IDF refuses to let through.

25
lemm.ee

Possibly the families of some of the people killed by Hamas. I bet they’re suffering.

-4
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Yeah I bet their friends are doing things like bringing them food to help and their jobs are giving them extra time off or something.

5

Both of which are things the families of 27,000 Gazans cannot do right now. They have no jobs, no food, and there's a good chance their friends are dead too.

1
capitalreply
lemmy.world

The calculus changes when everything from ambulances to children could be actual, literal bombs.

Edit: oh and, Israel isn’t the only country that borders Gaza.

-13
???reply

The calculus changes when everything from ambulances to children could be actual, literal bombs.

That's a really weird way to say, "I'll kill any Palestinian that moves, even the cattle, because I can't even bother viewing them as human beings".

Would it be acceptable if someone shot an Israeli ambulance, saying, "well, you never know these days, these ambulances are full of IDF ready to attack!"?

Nope, and neither should the opposite.

10
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Nope. No you don't get to go down that road. We dealt with that uncertainty in Iraq without causing a massive famine or using 2,000 pound bombs. There are no excuses for genocide, and certainly not victim blaming.

9
capitalreply
lemmy.world

It sounds like you’re saying if Jihadists use ambulances and children then there’s no defense. Just lay down and die.

-3
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Sounds like you're trying to lump every person in Gaza in with Hamas. Professional soldiers have procedures for those situations. Ones Israel isn't using.

3
capitalreply
lemmy.world

I’m not.

I’m very clearly saying that when you’re fighting a group who straps bombs to kids, you have to consider that even those appearing to be regular civilians might be a threat.

-3

Oh but you are. Because we've done this. We know how to deal with those problems without committing a genocide. The only reason to answer charges of genocide with , "but the kids might have weapons!" Is to blame the victims.

2
Ilovethebombreply
lemm.ee

Indifference is unacceptable, you must care about the thing!

Sod off.

-21
abuttandahalfreply
lemmy.ml

Indifference about genocide is not just unacceptable, it's evil, you piece of shit.

29
crapwittynamereply
lemm.ee

You are simultaneously denying the Uyghur genocide on another thread, you fucking nasty little hypocrite.

5
abuttandahalfreply
lemmy.ml

Palestinians are being murdered and ethnically cleansed in the tens of thousands. Thousands are dying weekly and this is being documented. We are seeing the people dying. We saw with our eyes Israel destroy all requisites for life in the Gaza and prevent all food and water from entering.

On the other hand we have seen quite literally nothing supporting the claim that China is committing Uygher genocide. Literally nothing. Uygher people continue to live normally in Xinjiang. They continue to practice their allegedly repressed culture. They continue to communally practice their allegedly repressed religion. Uygher genocide only exists in the propaganda of the United States state department and the minds of those it influences and those it employs.

-4
crapwittynamereply
lemm.ee

We haven't seen "literally nothing". That is a flat lie. There is a ton of evidence, presented by organisations who you choose to call liars because it allows you to deny the truth. There are non US affiliated organisations calling the Party out, too. A true humanist would not dismiss the evidence of the Xinjiang genocide. Both the Palestinians and the Uyghurs are facing genocide, and you're petty enough to be tribal about it. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on you monstrous cunt.

2

We have in fact seen absolutely no evidence that China is committing genocide in Xinjiang. None.

1

Oh look, a Lemmy.ml user acting like a prick. How unprecedented.

Nobody owes you their attention.

0

This is the most goated comment I've ever read in lemmy. Fucking based.

9

Dude, most of us are on the other side of the world, living in countries that can do little more than send a sternly worded letter to Israel.

Being constantly reminded of that shitshow doesn't help.

-6
AMDIsOurLordreply
lemmy.ml

Well then, log off your main acc and create one locked just to the good feelings parts of lemmy

You do have the option of taking a digital break. You must remember thst everyone has a limit, and once you push them hard enough they tend to push back

20
lemm.ee

That must be nice, not having your life put in danger so you can feel depressed about hearing other people's life being put in danger. Hope it lasts for you, but predictions for this century say war is going to become pretty rampant globally, so I'd recommend you find a way of coping with it better.

14

There's a video going around that pretty much has a lot to say about what biblical scholars have found out about that, you should watch it. But the world as it is has everyone essentially belonging to "people" who would be oppressed if they chose to move someplace else in the world, they just don't build their entire identity around it. I mean, look at the Canaanites, they even have religions that completely sanctify their genocide in their scriptures.

1

Not what you were complaining about or even identifying with. About the only common theme is a desperate love for making yourself out to be the victim after receiving criticism.

The only one trying to live in a bubble of ignorance is yourself, my comment was leading up to the exact opposite, that if it does not affect you personally, it will, so stop acting and ignoring all the people it is affecting personally because of "me, me, me" and how and when it less severely affects you, and face it.

Getting assaulted by a stranger is bad, huh. Now apply f-ing empathy, get some off of ebay if you must. Just don't try to get me to empathize with playing the part of an ignorant fool.

1

It's not Palestinians' fault for being occupied and mass murdered. How are you so shameless centering and victimizing yourself for being forced to hear about people suffering genocide? This shit is unbelievable.

10
lemm.ee

The only escape from something you cannot escape is to embrace it. The thing that degrades mental health is being unwillingly exposed. If the thing cannot be avoided, the only other move is to willingly expose yourself to it.

3

So these nightmares are coming to you without your consent. That’s why your mental health is declining. To go the other direction, you face those nightmares willingly.

One way to do this would be to write down one of your nightmares. Nobody forces you through that writing other than yourself. It happens at your pace, at your initiative.

That willing approach is the path out of your sickness.

Please try this before you try shooting yourself.

1
Ilovethebombreply
lemm.ee

Palestine supporters are fairly unique in the fact that not caring or not having a position is unacceptable to them. You must care, you must share their viewpoint, nothing else is possible.

You didn't see the same reaction to, for example, Ukraine being invaded. Indifference was acceptable.

-18
???reply
lemmy.world

You didn’t see the same reaction to, for example, Ukraine being invaded. Indifference was acceptable.

In the example of Ukraine, countries have taken countless measures to pressure Russia. In this case, counties are complicit in the genocide. There's a difference. People don't protest when politicians do at least the bare minimum.

16
capitalreply
lemmy.world

Might have something to do with the fact that Russia was unprovoked. Which is very different than this conflict.

-5
LarmyOfLonereply
lemm.ee

It's making all of us sick. I wish I could ignore all this too. I actually tried to, but then my government decided to step in on the world state and loudly pronounce "there is no genocide!". And then cut humanitarian funding after the international court of justice anonymously found "credibly risk of genocide". Which makes my country now complicit if this genocide is allowed to continue. Which makes me deeply ashamed and angry.

28

I'm basing this on the facts as presented by Israel themselves and judged practically anonymously by 15 judges of the highest court of the world. Sure, but have YOU considered you could be wrong?

If you're wrong you're aiding a genocide. If I'm wrong I'm just another "anti-semite".

7
???reply
lemmy.world

Block everyone you disagree with

24
Maggotyreply
lemmy.world

Yup, it's a drag. We need to do something about it though, it's like a rash. It doesn't go away until you see the doctor, or in this case vote in someone willing to tell other countries they can't do this shit with our weapons.

22
HungryJerboareply
lemmy.ca

I'm sorry you feel this way.

Try to remember that the internet is not fully representative of real life. The world outside will hopefully feel less angry and stressful than this online one.

Definitely avoid social media doomscrolling. It's fucking toxic.

10

Doesn't have to be the whole planet, just the top 400 richest people would do wonders though. Most of us are just trying to get by, put the blame on the one misusing "human resources".

6
???reply
lemmy.world

That I understand. Maybe you could try a browser extension to block text or news based on keywords? One parental control extension helped me filled out news from rich people that piss me off

8

:( sorry.

You can’t filter IRL yet but what about only subscribing to wholesome communities?

I think that’ll eliminate at least 95% of the problem here.

Also don’t forget we live in a simulation / you’re the only person who exists, so you can smile best you can at the war news and ignore it best you can.

10

Leave Lemmy? Use a front end with filtering/blocking? Change communities? Plenty of options if you just take a hreath and think instead of whining.

23
zmrlreply

How are you using lemmy? I use Connect on android and it has a setting for word filters that filter posts you dont want. This drastically improved my exerience once i started using it to filter trump posts.

8