Spyke
feddit.uk

Someone who's a beeb star isn't presenting their radio show tomorrow.

Makes you wonder.

11

So they finally cought up to gordon the gopher huh?

About bloody time.

6
blackn1ghtreply
feddit.uk

Age of consent is 16 but I think both parties need be 18+ for sharing explicit selfies.

13

Which is a pretty retarded law if you think about it.

2

As with Philip Scholfield, there is such a disparity in age and power that it becomes very iffy. I'm not sure there's anything illegal going on but it's morally problematic.

-3

The problem with "moral" problems is, who sets the morals? The church has been setting them for years, but they are now regarded as outdated and, to be frank, not a shining example of good "morality".

10
lemmy.world

I don't mind paying a licence fee if it goes towards Sir David etc. But you've got to question wages that allow 'tens of thousands' to be splashed (oo-er) in only three years.

And BBC wonder why people complain about them.

4
lemmy.one

Wait a minute.. David Attenborough is a household name 🙊 surely not!?

5
lemmy.world

So there’s an injunction I’m guessing and now it’s the whodunnit.

4
theoryreply
feddit.uk

They say its a "household name", surely we can work this out

2
Nfamwapreply
lemmy.world

Barry Scott off of Cillit Bang always gave me wrong 'un vibes.

7

If there's an injunction against publishing the name that means that the story is already out in public, but apparently only the Sun have it? Hummm.

2

You reached the end