Another week, another article arguing that Decker in Blade Runner, and that knowing this completely ruins the movie ...
This acclaimed director has brought us some of the best films of the last half century, but he ruined of his best.
Argue below
https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/blade-runner-ridley-scott-replicant.htmlOpen linkView original on kbin.social
I feel like this title is missing some words.
All those... moments... will lost in time.
My secret plan to driving engagement by posting a title with missing words so people would check into complain is working exactly as expected.
What if the bridged gap isn't meant to be between Deckard and Roy, but between the viewer and them?
I agree 100%. I'd go a bit farther and say one of the points of the movie is that it doesn't really matter if Deckard's a replicant.
At the end, Deckard suspects he's a replicant, but the unicorn could be coincidence. Gaff could just be messing with him, or maybe Gaff's having the same dreams as Deckard.
@inkican definitely, definitely not a replicant. For all the reason outlined here! Great share