Spyke
kbin.social

Didn't they basically give it to everyone who has instagram? That would make the numbers inherently padded

27

While it uses your instagram account, it's a separate app and you have to actually go through sign up to be on it. So while there is less of a hurdle, it’s definitely not anyone on instagram, only if you’ve actively signed up for it.

18
lemmy.world

Not hard to achieve if they just auto-enroll everyone with a meta account.

12
Rengokureply
lemmy.world

I wish people would stop spouting nonsense and hoax like you just did.

You need to create your damn Threads account manually.

51
Sheltacreply
lemmy.world

Okay, let me rephrase that.

That’s easy to achieve if you use a massive billion-person platform to aggressively push Threads on everyone’s faces and make it very easy to accidentally create an account.

Better?

36

Indeed it is better, because that's actually the truth.

24
imaBEESreply
lemmy.world

I’ve actually not gotten any sort of advertising about it from Instagram/Meta, be in the the app or email or anything. I’ve only seen the tech blogs and people on twitter posting about it organically, so I wouldn't say they're aggressively pushing it, at least right now

5
Reclipsereply
lemdro.id

Do people accidentally download an app and then sign in there regularly or just this one time?

0
Sheltacreply
lemmy.world

You should see my grandma’s phone. It’s full of apps from ads.

I’m pretty sure there’s 10 million grandmas.

2
Reclipsereply
lemdro.id

Do you really believe that 10 million gramdma who were on Instagram has now opened threads account or are you just zucking with me?

They have 30 million users now btw.

1
Bushwhackreply
lemmy.world

Except I was prompted to create an account no less than like 2-3 times in the 2-3 times I opened Instagram after it launched. It’s not automatic but it is damn near two step enrollment. I’d like to see ”active users” two weeks/months from now after the enrollment storm passes to see who actually stayed with it.

9
Anders429reply
lemmy.world

I guarantee that my great aunt probably created one because she just wanted to get the popup to go away so she could look at pictures of her grandkids. Probably doesn't even know what Threads is.

3

I literally had someone request to “follow me” who then immediately text me and ask — what is this thing that it just put me on.

They are definitely inflating numbers and making it hard to drop user count because deleting threads deletes your Instagram too.

You’ll only ever hear about total users now never “active” would be my guess which after a few days or weeks will be significantly less than the “10 million” that supposedly “signed up”

4
Yewbreply
kbin.social

Why would you believe ANYTHING that meta says?

2

Is it something they read or something they've done? Perhaps they had to make their own Threads account.

I wouldn't be surprised if many accounts were auto-enrolled, but it may be based on activity or just a random selection to boost numbers without the massive leap of all accounts being transferred at once.

1

I would like to confirm, but threads is not available in the EU and probably some other places as well…

1

Not shocked with how Twitter has been lately. Also it feels more or less like Twitter, if immature so far.

10
Enttropyreply
kbin.social

Follows the Reddit flock to join Lemmy. *

Ughh… People are such sheep.

13
errerreply
lemmy.world

It was a considered decision to come here, unlike the 30 million people who mindlessly joined threads. So yeah, there’s a difference.

1
Stelus42reply
lemmy.ca

"I can read the minds of millions, nobody joining threads ever considered their decision!"

0

Not hard to characterize the thoughts of morons. Apparently you’re too dumb to do the same.

0
lemmy.zip

What, for looking at a twitter alternative after it's been performing so poorly the past few days? How is that being a sheep?

1

You reached the end